I haven't tried this in a while, let's see if we can get some interest in a thread like this

Because the gangs in those places are laughable compared to gangs in the third world.

> Los Angeles
It’s not the 80s anymore.
It’s now one of the nicest cities I’ve been to.
t. Bellflower resident

Lol right. The dispensary here in San Francisco brings it to my house with a receipt. I can order from my phone these days

I specifically recall seeing Wilmington mentioned in these threads many times, back when I sued to post them regularly, like 2-3 years ago. I only know of the city, because I've seen it on the address for credit card applications or bill collections, or some shit like that, so I had no idea that it was a dangerous place. However, when it was mentioned, people said that it is straight-up fucking terrible there, like, as bad as Philadelphia and Chester, Pa, which is another lesser-known city, like Wilmington, that was often mentioned as being a really rough place.

Btw, what are the cops in Wilmington like? Are they thugged-out gangster, as well? I would assume, and hope, so; because you need badass/gangster cops to be able to go to war with the baddass/gangster street thugs that ruin cities and kill people.

That sounds like a really shitty situation. Is Chelsea as bad as the worst parts of/around Boston? Is Chelsea as bad as Philly? Baltimore? Camden? Buffalo?

I've seen comments like this in past threads, but how the fuck could there be places, and people, who are much worse than the thugged-out motherfucking killers in places like Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, Atlanta, Miami, Houston, Memphis, New Orleans, etc.?

I have heard that, which is why I only included LA towards the bottom of the list, and I almost left it off. However, I have to think that there are so many gangs, and overall gang members, that Los Angeles still had to have lots of fucking terrible areas that are incredibly crime-ridden, dangerous and violent. Right? Plus, Skid Row is no joke and is not a place you want to be after dark, if I'm not mistaken.

As a britbong who has only ever been to the middle of butt fuck nowhere in California on military exercises, where would be the best place to go? I'm not a big fan of cities, I prefer small towns, forests, mountains, etc. Scenery over buildings, if that makes sense.

Yeah skid row is a mess. Watts is a hellhole too. Oddly Compton and Long Beach are becoming increasingly gentrified

I take it that you are from the Los Angeles area? If so, I'm curious, do the gangs ever fuck with or get in to confrontations with the homeless people around there? And what are the homeless people generally like? Do they generally just want/ask for money? Or, like many of them in San Francisco seem to be, are they mentally ill maniacs who are confrontational and violent and who approach and harass people constantly?

I’m from SF originally and the do seem to be more mentally ill in the Bay Area and more of a beach bum/druggie vibe here in Los Angeles. Especially in the Venice beach area. As a generalization gangs don’t want to draw unnecessary attention to themselves. Kinda Of a don’t start shit and there won’t be shit mind set

>Chelsea
Its technically not part of Boston, but basically as bad as the worst parts of Boston proper (Roxbury/Dorchester/Mattapan)

>13.) Cincinnati
Nice, though I thought we'd rank higher. Until those faggots in Ferguson we were the most recent city to have a race riot.