I haven't tried this in a while, let's see if we can get some interest in a thread like this

I kek'd, despite my love for Claes Oldenberg

I left in 2012 but same difference. Fuck tolls. And fuck snow too lol

Damn! So, you are from SF, but now live in LA? If so, which city has a worse homeless problem? I know that there are more homeless people in LA, but it sounds like they are more prevalent in SF, because of the density of the city. Also, it sounds like the homeless population cause way more problems in SF than they do in LA. I have no idea why that is, but I've read many comments about this over the past couple years and it certainly sounds like the homeless people in SF cause way more problems than the homeless people in LA cause.

Also, I know that San Francisco has some really nice areas, as does Los Angeles, but I've also heard that SF has major gang/crime/violence/problem problems and while not as widespread and massive as the gang problems in LA, it sounds like they have serious gang/drug/violence problems in the Bay Area, for sure. And I know that Oakland gets the majority of the attention and blame for the bay Area's crime problems, but it definitely sounds like San Francisco deserves plenty of blame, too.

FYI, I made the list myself and put it together while in a hurry. I'm curious, do you think that the crime/violence problems in Cincinnati are on the same level as that shit in Cleveland? Or is Cleveland significantly worse? Also, are you familiar with Youngstown? I am not very familiar with it, but I have heard/read that it's no fucking joke there, that there are serious drug, crime and violence problems there and that there is still a legitimate mob presence in Youngstown. Do you know about any of this?

Are the worst parts of Boston/Chelsea as bad as the worst parts of Baltimore, Philadelphia, Camden, Trenton, Jersey City, East Orange, NYC, Buffalo, Rochester?

Eh I know. Woke up to snow this morning actually