Yas Forums‘s main complaint of this seems to be that it’s faux intellectual and that it isn’t “deep” enough. what would you change to make it “actually deep”?
Yas Forums‘s main complaint of this seems to be that it’s faux intellectual and that it isn’t “deep” enough...
Brody Nelson
Other urls found in this thread:
Colton Wood
That awful palette. Blargh. eye vomit. literally PurpleKecleon tier
Jordan Evans
But I liked it
Juan Bell
> what would you change to make it “actually deep”?
The whole point of having an animated show is that you get to illustrate how your ideas work visually within a narrative with actual characters and progression. They didn't do that here. Instead they just slapped on previous episodes of their podcast to random animation sequences that are just there for shock and trippy-ness.
The entire time I was watching this, I wanted to either turn the video off or the audio off because having them both clash was extremely distracting. That's not even mentioning the mic-popping sounds from the audio or the random jumps in volume, or the switch between the podcast recording and bad voice-acting tacked on to try to make the animation seem relevant.
Nicholas Evans
>what would you change to make it “actually deep”?
If it called out the jews.
Jaxson Howard
Replace all the vacuous hippies on the podcast with actual experts on things like hallucinogenic treatments for depression, neuroscience, physics, AI, sleep, etc.
Or at the very least acceedited theologists
Lucas Allen
>da jooos
blue-pilled retard take
Robert Cooper
Nothing is ever actually "deep", it’s all a meme. You can shut the fuck up about it if you don’t like it.
Robert Green
isn't one of the voices a child killer satanist? one of the memphis three?
Joseph Sullivan
In one way yes but also no.