Is this statement true? Do you think that people that only makes money by doing music is worth listening?

nah mate don't do it for all of them
just radiohead

Talent doesnt get along with money. They all end up selling themselves. They start doing something worth and turn it to crap, thats the point.

radiohead who have been mentioned in this thread already did the exact opposite, after creating a hugely successful chart topping album they created their 2 best and most inaccessible albums immediately following it
the beatles didn’t do that
bjork didn’t
kate bush didn’t
lou reed didn’t
it’s not a rule, it’s not even that common

I think that this is true as long as underground becomes mainstream. That's about niche genres and he's right

Attached: IMG_20200322_214535_577.jpg (1080x854, 130K)

>my excuse is that they're talented and they earned it.
lol no they didnt "earn" it their label marketed them the correct way in order to max profits and them getting rich is a product of a mass deliberate scheme by corporate powers

Do you think that [your favorite trap musician] deserved it?

L M A O

Listening to Iron Maiden does not exclude me from listening to listening to lesser known bands. At the same time, I am not going to avoid such an impossibly based group of musicians just because they've earned some well deserved wealth.

what about separating the art from the artist?

if they're dead, that's good.

Making great art and getting rich off of it is the most based thing one can do.