noone is claiming that the beatles where the greatest thing that ever happened but one thing they did do is help teach people that you dont need to sing covers to survive as an artist. obviously they wernt the only ones, but in 64 they were the biggest
to be honest i dont really listen to the beatles anymore. so you know, stop crying
The only reason why Oasis exists is because of the Beatles
Henry Diaz
Dylan Mitchell
people also claim that The Beatles were the first to have artistic album covers which makes you already know that they are ignorant of jazz musicians once again.
> the beatles are still better than at least most of the artists you listed though.
objectively not. Because the bands I listed innovated while Beaters didn't.
Grayson Russell
The premise of this movie is so fucking stupid. If everyone forgot The Beatles and you came out plagiarising them today everyone would just think you're just a generic oldschool rock throwback act. The beatles have ripped off and have been ripped off over the decades so much that to fresh ears they're the most bland thing since unsalted crackers.
Isaac Davis
>overrating innovativeness
Improving and perfecting a formula is just as important, and oftentimes even more so than coming up with a new one.
Kayden Ramirez
even by that, Beatles didn't do well.
they pretty much were performing downplayed psychedelic in Sgt. Peppers.
anything by Paul you can guarantee is simplistic both instrumentally and lyrically. John was the only one with any pioneering qualities, be it pretentious. The only thing you could really said they did good was pop music.