The only reason why Oasis exists is because of the Beatles

>The only reason why Oasis exists is because of the Beatles
The fuck is this horseshit??

Attached: shitty movie.png (844x1336, 1.36M)

that's oasis 101 mate

the only reason pretty much any band after 1970 exists is because of the beatles. time to grow up

The Smiths and the Stone Roses had more impact on Oasis than anything else. The "Oasis copied the Beatles" meme is stupid and exists entirely because of a vague 60s psych-pop influence

>The only reason why Oasis exists is because of Status Quo and Slade

who /tooktheirgfs/ to this movie?

That's absolutely 100% true.

Terrible movie is awful

when I first heard of this movie I was kinda interested but after thinking about it for a few minutes I hate the fucking premise of this movie it's just everybody's pathetic fantasy (mine included) come to life. self-indulgent wankery. disappointed in Danny Boyle.

had the same reaction watching coming previews at cinema. i think i was LOLing too

Is it worth watching?

"what if you woke up one morning and you had a giant elephant cock, and nobody had ever heard about porn movies before....?

i know you're joking but there's people out there who actually believe this.

I watched it with my dad and we both agreed that the concept was cool but the execution was shit. Not even him who is the blindest Beatles fanboy on Earth liked this turd lol

You're a retard. Learn pop history for once.

the truth

I fucking hate this premise so god damned much. If The Beatles never existed a different band or bands would have filled the void.

T.beach boys fag

If I was one of the Beatles I would’ve stopped it from even getting greenlit

>Revolver literally invented Psychedelic.
>13th Floor Elevators? Never heard of them
>White Album literally invented Heavy Metal.
>Blue Cheer? Never heard of them
>There has been nothing as innovative as Revolution 9
>Silver Apples? Why are you naming these bands? No one remembers them so who cares.
>They were the first to produce a concept album!
>Frank Zappa? Who's that?
>You're a retard. LEARN POP HISTORY FOR ONCE.

Attached: BASED.png (1000x800, 166.54K)

>If The Beatles never existed a different band or bands would have filled the void.
Kek. Way to miss the point on why The Beatles are so celebrated.

i mean hes not wrong but that doesnt mean hes saying everyone after the 60s were thinking "man the beatles are great i wanna be like them"

The absolute cope of Beatles hater.

based

Soulless

Its always funny to me when faggots on Yas Forums try to seriously criticize something that was made for normies and didn't had the pretension of the albums that they listen to; its just a summer feel good movie you fucking nigger, nobody cares that you didn't liked it, nobody even likes you.

stop pretending you know anything about music.
just enjoy the band and avoid making stupid claims that are simply not true. god you are the worst fucking fags on this board.

>WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH I DON'T LIKE BEINGGGGG WRONNNNNGGGGGGGGGG
Zappa fan by any chance?

no... im a music fan.

>>They were the first to produce a concept album!
>>Frank Zappa? Who's that?
frank sinatra and woodie guthrie did it earlier than zappa too. the beatles are still better than at least most of the artists you listed though.
>t. danny boyle
why the fuck would you do that? it's easy money and it won't harm the reputation of the beatles either. if i was in a big band like this, i'd want tons of shitty movies made about us

noone is claiming that the beatles where the greatest thing that ever happened but one thing they did do is help teach people that you dont need to sing covers to survive as an artist. obviously they wernt the only ones, but in 64 they were the biggest
to be honest i dont really listen to the beatles anymore. so you know, stop crying

people also claim that The Beatles were the first to have artistic album covers which makes you already know that they are ignorant of jazz musicians once again.
> the beatles are still better than at least most of the artists you listed though.
objectively not. Because the bands I listed innovated while Beaters didn't.

The premise of this movie is so fucking stupid. If everyone forgot The Beatles and you came out plagiarising them today everyone would just think you're just a generic oldschool rock throwback act. The beatles have ripped off and have been ripped off over the decades so much that to fresh ears they're the most bland thing since unsalted crackers.

>overrating innovativeness
Improving and perfecting a formula is just as important, and oftentimes even more so than coming up with a new one.

even by that, Beatles didn't do well.
they pretty much were performing downplayed psychedelic in Sgt. Peppers.
anything by Paul you can guarantee is simplistic both instrumentally and lyrically. John was the only one with any pioneering qualities, be it pretentious. The only thing you could really said they did good was pop music.