Why do Liberals and Conservatives deny science? Why is this board full of these retards?
Why do Liberals and Conservatives deny science? Why is this board full of these retards?
Other urls found in this thread:
Because shit had become so polarized as to not allow room for nuance. It's "us versus them" and if you're not "us" or "them" you'll just be drowned out by both side's squabbling.
Granted I think the radical left takes the cake for their willingness to devour their own. Probably why they lose so fucking always.
I remember kids thought politics was gay when I was a kid. Now it seems like every gen Zer is very political one way or the other.
in a very bandwagon way though
Seems like everything with liberals is always emotionally-based whereas conservatives rely more so on basic facts & common sense. most liberal viewpoints are admirable because they're rooted in compassion but, like that saying, "the road to hell is paved with good intentions..."
Conservatism just seems to make more sense for me. It's the much more "fair" side. Also, when it comes to social issues such as trans & homosexuality and that shit, conservatism is mostly, "be whatever you want to be/look however you want to look; just don't be a drain on society." Any stereotype attributed to Conservatives about being anti-gay/anti-whatever, I'm sure, is just a projection painted upon them by the mainstream media which looks to be about 90% liberal anyway.
Dude, you're fucking retarded
You’re foolin yourself friend. “Don’t be a drain on society” usually translates to “you’re a second class citizen because you aren’t within our comfort bubble”
Plus most states that have heavy utilization of government resources are red states so..
> Dude, you're fucking retarded
haha, this is what I mean, lol.
Also a basic run down of your Facebook will show you there’s no projection lol. Most people that lean on the conservative side are old boomers that have the most absurd perspectives and usually line up with Fox News talking points
>Plus most states that have heavy utilization of government resources are red states so..
That sounds incorrect to me but then again, I don't know for sure so I'm not going to contest it. But I mean, just look at most major cities in the US. They're all in mostly disarray and their mayors are hardcore liberals.
>Dude, you're fucking retarded
the zoomer said
Fpbp
Because major cities have a diverse population and that’s why they are largely liberal. It’s actually been proven that people who move from smaller, more rural areas to big cities become more liberal over time.
It’s not because a cities liberal that it’s in disarray, it’s just because someone’s an idiot and can’t run it right. You find that no matter where you go.
If you're bringing age into it though, consider that these so-called "boomers" (when really, "boomer" is used too much and incorrectly. It's Gen X'ers) were Democrats when they were younger and with age, responsibility and wisdom, they realized it's more advantageous on several fronts, to be conservative. Conservativism favors order, cleanliness, and fairness. It's the genuine "equality for all" whereas Liberalism likes to only delegate equality to classes they feel are under represented. That fucks with societies in the wrong kind of way. Again, admirable but the wrong way to do things.
>It’s actually been proven
Oh reallly? Wow. Where?
>sex difference deniers only exist with LIBS durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Lol conservatism is why Jim Crow laws were a thing. What’s “fair” or equal about that?
Defense of marriage act. Signed by a democrat, but Clinton was pretty conservative.
Equality ensures there is no one under represented. I don’t see there being 2 ways about that particular notion.
It was a cracked article I read a few years ago. They had some sources posted for it.
Nothing on the left is science based, except differences in physical sex, which no one denies.
Even if we COULD prove intelligence differences, as long as the smart people reproduce there is really no problem with idiots breeding.
Cuz i mean... are you going to tell some Trump supporters they can't breed? Good fucking luck
I think it's great the younger folks have an interest in politics but many are the radicals I speak of. Say "it's nice nature is getting a reprieve during the pandemic" and suddenly you're a racist, ecofascist that likes human death and "ignores capitalism" as though it works exclusive of humanity. Acknowledge the significance of biological sex and who fucking cares if you agree on ecological, economic, or social issues, or if you mostly support trans rights. You're now a transphobe, terf or whatever and you're getting cancelled.
Conservatives are too hung up on skydaddy (not that there aren't antivax lefties expecting to heal/protect themselves with potions, crystals or appeals to the stars and planets). While sensible they'll gladly deny science if you can convince them there's some hidden agenda behind it. To the extremes you get flat earthers, antivax, climate change denial (at least in so far as human-driven change) and so on. They're also slow to achieve anything except maybe expanding military budgets. What they don't realize, at least the blue collar ones, is whether a dem or republican gets elected it'll probably do fuckall to their tax bracket. If it is a dem who cares if their boss gets taxed harder? They're not gonna get the raise that they wouldn't have gotten anyway from a tax break that never trickles down?
BINGO
>Jim Crow laws were a thing
> were
> Defense of marriage act.
Wait, is that the Obama-signed gays-can-marry act? Sure. Hasn't been overturned by the current Conservative president.
> Equality ensures there is no one under represented.
But that's terrible, though. Just because a class is in some way under represented doesn't mean they're in peril as a result. I mean, I'm a white male and I'm under represented in the field of nursing and teaching. Doesn't bother me or many other white males one bit. My point is, trying to force or socially engineer things for the sake of equality when the inequality doesn't hurt anyone is bad and unfair to those who are genuinely good at something.
>deny science
Liberals say there are several genders, though. Science dictates there are only two. Being serious.
2 sexes. Gender is a spectrum between the 2
>Gender is a spectrum between the 2
That's not based on science, though. That's just some kind of theory based on emotion and trying to be nice.
Psychiatry is medical science
Only theory based, though. Watch, I bet you in like, either 10 or 15 years from now, you'll see a dramatic drop in the number of people who identify as trans or this/that, etc. (not trying to sound condescending there; it's just genuinely confusing and hard to keep up with and, frankly, not that important, in my opinion). I believe it's honestly just a trend at the moment.
You're an idiot.
IQ has repeatedly been proven to be a shitty test. Obviously some people are inherently intelligent in the same way some people are inherently athletic. But similar to how a fat guy can learn to run a marathon, the dumbest people on earth can learn to overcome their shortcomings. The same is true for sex differences, which mostly affect physique, but sexist retards believe it affects mental faculties more than it does.
>dude gets married
>he and wife try to have kids
>no luck
>go to doctor for referral
>find out dude is chromosomal female but physically male
>can't even use in vitro
Men are a metabolite of women: males are what female bodies produce in order to make more females. That's why men have nipples, you're modified females.
it's a fad. the thing is that it's supposed to be fashionable. fashion always goes out of style.
Plenty of cultures have had more than two gender identities accepted throughout human history. And if we're pretending that the conservative agenda is "be what you want to be, but don't be a drain on society" I direct you to the state I just moved away from: North Carolina's bathroom bill.
How dare someone with different genitals pee next to me.
That's sort of beside the point but I thought I made clear there are those on the left who will deny science as well.
I recognize two biological sexes (granted the intersexed do occur). Given some historical/cultural examples I'll even recognize traditional gender roles, while dominant, may have some blurring between them. I don't recognize the myriad new genders that have arisen.
But again it's all far removed from my general point that somebody praised one day for their work with the poor or passion for the wetlands might get socially lynched the next day for suggesting the 6'9" MtF with male skeletal and muscular structure probably shouldn't be allowed to play on the girls basketball team.
They say there are two sexes and gender is what you make of it.
Neither is society. No one designed society, it's just what we perceive it to be. Currently lean muscular people are considered superior, while not so long ago (or in fact, in some places today), being really fat is a symbol of wealth and rank.
It doesn't matter what stupid trans people are doing to their bodies, as long as they feel like doing it. Stupid trend? Probably. Who cares? It doesn't affect you any more than people that get stupid tattoos and weird piercings. There's nothing wrong with conforming to or rebelling against gender norms, nor is there anything wrong with body mods.
The real weird issue is what about minors? In every other case you could prohibit the action until adulthood, but if this "gender dysphoria" shit is a real thing, then waiting that long prevents the 'treatment."
You're probably right. But we are at the age where gender roles in society are as thin and hard to tell apart as have ever been.
But that doesn't change the fact that there could be, albeit small part of the population that do identify as the other gender and imo it's worth to help those people. And the fags who did it for attention are probably the ones killing themselves anyways.
a lot of science is opinion, not fact. something that is universally accepted such as "hot air rises" is simply false, but people dont apply their mind to think about whats actually happening. we live in a sensual illusion but people prefer delusion
that's not really how it works at all but IQ is real. anthroplogists/neuroscientists/philosophers consider the things that are the basis of AI and machine learning for computer science which are conceptual symbols and weighted connections between them.
it is known that different races never acquired the same conceptual symbols (anthropology) to form connections (neuroscience) to form similar minds (philosophy) and to create good AI and machine learning algorithms, such perceptive qualities as those observed in different races--leaving some inherently lower than others--are incorporated.
you appear to know that "some people are inherently intelligent". that intelligence is based on conceptual symbols and connections between them. i bet a lot of people would be shocked to think that such "heretic" SCIENCE exists and is being taught in universities. it's like the kind of shit that gets burned in "the name of the rose" or the great library at Alexandria.
>>dude gets married
>>he and wife try to have kids
>>no luck
>>go to doctor for referral
>>find out dude is chromosomal female but physically male
can you please find me even just one- wait, no, first, can you please find the real life version of this story? And then a second case of it happening? Because it sounds like that scenario is probably extremely, extremely rare or even non existent.
> How dare someone with different genitals pee next to me.
It's too much of a risk. Someone can easily enter a bathroom because of some law that legalizes mixed bathrooms and rape, assault, etc. the opposite sex.
pretty interesting.