This shit is so easy to debunk it's embarrassing

Can someone actually definitively define what 'god' is? Because it seems like there's a lot of wriggle room about debating the existence of god in the bible, firstly from pedantic hermenutical and exegetic issues of interpretation of what was really meant. but then there's always some smart ass who is like
>but you believe that there is something, right user?
How can you answer that unless they actually explain what that 'something' is?

>exegetic issues of interpretation of what was really meant
That's actually an inherent problem. Did God fail to communicate clearly? God isn't supposed to fail.
>God communicated the message but the pen was held by fallible men
Did God fail to find/create an adequate scribe? God isn't supposed to fail.

Don't put the cart before the horse. I asked what is the definition of god? How do I know the failure to communicate is an issue if I don't know the nature of the supposed god which the standard of communication and immunity of his message to mere mortals is indeed some kind of indicator of godhood or if it is compatible unless I have a clear definition of what god is?
You can't make that assumption without defining just what the hell you're talking about.

If god is kind why he gave us niggers

So we know just how generous he was to us by showing us what he could have done?

Bro. You're confused.
> God needs people to write stuff.
> God can't make people do stuff.
> God made ALL people, but can't make people anymore.
> God made a perfect world, but tolerates imperfection for 'fun' and revenge against his toy people.
> Shut up and suck the priest's holiness already.

This is some retarded shit.

Because God is a nigger, son.

This is easy to debunk. Through the hebrew translation it does not always translate to moral evil

Yes I am confused because you haven't told me who this 'god' is first.
This is your argument at the moment
>Dude it can't be Pierre, this guy is allergic eggs. And if he's allergic to eggs then he can't enjoy omelettes, and omelettes are delicious. Pierre only likes delicious stuff, therefore this guy is not Pierre.
I don't even know who the fuck is Pierre, now you're trying to assure me that delicious omelettes are essential to his PIerre-ness?
That's what you're doing.