Can someone tell me this car's model?

I didn't say he did. it was a general question. look at the car in OP's pic.

Where i got tue pic ppl were compaining about tue camber too, must be a drift build

alright that makes sense i guess

Chevrolet Shitbox69 2002

you play torn?

There's a nice red Nissan similar to this in the new Netflix series Hyperdrive.

What the hairy fuck is torn?

I don't understand how anything can think that looks good. Those tires are just fucking silly.

Attached: IMG_20191029_205340.jpg (828x822, 103.36K)

torn city. Reliant Robins are a bit of a meme there.

It's a drift-style stanced build. Nothing performance about that amount of camber, even for drifting. It's almost definitely on airbags to be able to sit that low for a photo, because that splitter would be gone in minutes if it was driven like that.

It was a Nisan S14.

>It is heavily modified with a widebody kit, camber and lowering (stanced out)
Lot of words there. Quicker and easier to say
>It looks like shit

- It's a 1997 or 1998 Nissan 240sx.
- Car people call it an S14 because that's the internal name for the car at Nissan, and it's cool to call cars by their chassis codes.
- It's also called a Kouki (the Japanese word for later. The previous body style is called Zenki, which means previous). Google S14 kouki, then S14 zenki.
- It's also called a Silvia because that's what the car is called in Japan. シルビア (in Japenglish- "Shirubia")

Junk ones cost about $3000, a good condition stock one costs about $7000, and a nicely modified one goes from $8000-30000

Really? Got me intersted. I'll watch it

I'm from Tamworth and proud, that is all.

>alright that makes sense i guess
No it doesn't. The camber you're seeing is on the front wheels, which is exactly the axle you don't want to slide when you drift a car. It looks like that because some retard who doesn't understand automotive dynamics and doesn't care that it fucks the suspension geometry for any driving activity thinks it looks cool

Thx for the brief explanation user.
Even not modified the car looks nice but in this pic it is gorgeous

Nissan 200SX (S14 model) from late 90’s up to early 20’s.
Headlights give it away.

Wankers - it is a 200SX Silvia - twhich would be your sisters car if you drove a R33 GTR "Nuttbuster"

Fuck yeah mate - Peel Street all the way - I lived there in 2005 and drove a Black Lotus Elise around

s14 facelift

while I agree with the guy saying this is a stance build that has camber for purely aesthetic reasons I have to say that I hope for your sake you are trolling. Drifting is a balance between oversteer and understeer, the rear is oversteering, the front is understeering, and the traction of the tires is the only thing keeping the car in the turn. Front camber is used because the sidewalls of the front tires roll over, so the negative camber essentially makes up for it, the surface of the front tire is virtually flat while drifting, or on racecars with less negative camber the same principle applies. Drive wheels tend to lack camber for power application reasons, and if you watch fwd racecars some will have aggressive negative rear camber that rwd cars don't have because it would make acceleration difficult. Sometimes a drift car will have the rear tires slop over like the fronts, so it is normally advisable to use wider rear tires than the fronts, but this is case by case.

Nissan Silvia was much smaller,more angular,more family vehicle/2+2.
200SX was more a GT model/performance orientated vehicle.

Good reaction pic

nope - THE 200SZX IN JAPAN WAS STILL BADGED AS A SILVIA - which is nippon for girls car