Can anyone find the answer

57. Anyone who says otherwise is a brainlet faggot.

15

Explain your reasoning

What is the guy holding in his hands in the last line? Can't really tell.

shoe+shoe+shoe=3shoe=3x=30

3x/3=30/3=10

Considering the Symbols (shoes, man, the other thing) as variables, it follows:
s := shoes; m := man; t := Thing
s+s+s = 3 * s = 30 follows s = 30 / 3 = 10.
m+m+s = 2*m + 10 = 20 follows m = 10/2 = 5
t+t+m = 2*t + 5 = 13 follows t = 8/2 = 4
Conventionally we say * before +, so
s+m*t = s+(m*t) = 10 + (5*4) = 10 + (20) = 30.

And you failed the whole point of the puzzle. Learn2Logic

This.

19

19

Depends, if the pairs of shoes are 10 each then the single shoe is 5 but since the man below is wearing them,there's 3 shoes in the equation so there's the so its 5 + 15 x 2 (2 bowties are 4 but there's only 1 so it's 2) which is 35 if we go pedmas

81, anything else means you can't do pemdas nor pay attention to details

The left shoe could be 8 and the right could be 2.

If wearing/holding items adds their value to human value: 43

If its multiplicative, 405

If its something else entirely fuck off with your shit post faggot

He's holding sticks

21.
He's holding some shit in his hands which I gotta assume is those reddish thingies.

26?
Single shoe is 5
Guy is 5
Other thing is 2
In last image guy is wearing shoes and holding 2 of those things

97

>lurks /sci/
opinion discarded

You are waaaaaay overthinking it. Go ruin someone else's day.

>let me demonstrate how intelligent I am by solving a 3rd grade math problem

43. A shoe is 5, a guy is 5, and thingy is 2. Everybody can move on with their day now.

30

Ur a smart foggot

Attached: twat.jpg (552x556, 79.23K)

only correct answer. please make another one with the glowing eyes spider man boss guy from the "my dad predicted she was a single mom coalburner" copypasta

S+S+S=30
3S=30
S=10
M+M+10=20
2M=10
M=5
W+W+5=13
2W=8
W=4
(S/2)+((U)*(W/2))=X
U=M+W+S
U=5+4+10
U=19
(10/2)+((19)*(4/2))=X
5+(19*2)=X
5+38=X
X=43

One could argue that the undefined variable "U" of the man with wrist weights and shoes on is "technically" undefined, therefore the solution is unobtainable with the current information. However, we can make the assumption that it is an additive equation of the different variables that make up the whole picture, hence the substituted equation of U=M+W+S.

how many dicks do you take up your ass every minute?

Several fewer than do you.

Many. I probably couldn't concentrate without a phallic object inserted in my anus. How about you?

late to the party

The picture is ambiguous. There is absolutely no reason to believe that a symbol made up of the same picture presented twice would translate to twice the value of a different symbol made up of the same image presented once.

11 is not the same as 1+1.

>if the pairs of shoes are 10 each then the single shoe is 5

There is absolutely no reason to believe that is true.

Final image of the guy he is wearing shoes and holding those brown things

U all missed the point

Shoes doesn’t change becuz shoes is shoes it’s a constant although the math that makes up the shoes would change the concept of the shoes it the idea being conceptualized by the emoji shoe maybe I was unclear this is for very advanced maths not this remedial shit something big like where u would formulate multiple processes and operations and functions the idea of a matrix existing within a formula isn’t what changes the number that make up the matrix and the numbers resulting from the matrix are the only variables the concept of the matrix would never change so there for SHOES “IS” ALWAYS GOING TO BE SHOES

Was,were language translational barriers in code

E.g. “none of these methods WAS sufficient for us...”

No wonder ppl don’t understand English

Attached: 6366C34F-1607-4CD4-8B33-2201E2B4116E.gif (499x374, 432.92K)

It is perfectly logical to assume one singlr shoe is half the value of the pair since left and right are essentially identical in every way. the purpose of a puzzle like this isnt to simply be given 3 numbers and calculate the value. Its basically pictorial algebra

30/3=10
each shoe = 5

one man = 5 since 5+5+10 = 20

4+4+man = 13
each "rope" = 2

shoe+man*rope=?
5+(5*2)=15

Answer is 15.

20 final answer

if it's a logic riidle: answer can be found
if math riddle: unsolvable because 2 unknown factors

Attached: TOP 5 Supercomputer.png (869x605, 87.23K)

Plus it’s only needs to be hypothetical since there is no real value determined we don’t even need to think that far plug the maths into said computer and let it do the rest but those symbols don’t exist so the answer is not able to be determined and becuz there isn’t really enough characters in the alphabet to have a pattern emerge what is the least number of characters an alphabet has to have before a pattern can start to emerge and I can establish decryption

Just wanna point out the glaring power inefficiency of the chinks. and envirofags complaining about north america and europe

is it 33? the guy is holding something in the end and i can only assume its those loop things that are worth 2 each

36

No, keep going

No

30

17 geniuses wow

Ohh lol. I see it now. The picture was too low quality.

So the man is holding one rope thing in each hand with shoes on.

5+(5+2+2+5+5)*2 =
5+(19*2)=5+38

Answer is 43

43.
if 3 pairs of shoes equal 30 tan each shoe equals 5
if a pair of shoes(10) plus two men equals 20 each man equals 5
If four whatevers plus a man(5) equals 13 then each whatever equals 2
the man has a pair of shoes on and two whatevers in his hands, making him equal 19.
multiply that by two to get 38 and then add the 5.

43? i see le shoes now

50

Right

Ok so upon further inspection of the code becuz I’m going 9000 mph I see he’s wear two shoes which is still shoes, then he’s got a strap in each hand which is still straps so that’s one guy one shoes and one straps

So that 5 + 10 for the guy 1.5 but who knows how that’s applied and a pair for shoes 10 and one strap .75 there’s no telling what the guy means but it’s clear that someone wants to offer a guy shoes for sex u fucking faggot imply it again and I’ll crush ur larynx

No

43

Right on user

its 15

mb its actually 10

Bitch what do the Sox account for how much are they and did u account for his hair as a whole and what each hair is worth and what the parts of him break down into and all that happy shit or u wanna just stick with this shit we can get crazy with this how good at it are u?

This is also a way to see how my brain processes math so ur ducking Chinese python scripts can learn my trains nigger lol it’s all about trains of thought niggeronymous

Let’s see bondage of numbers so bonding the man ( ) { } [ ] looks like a good way to inspect code based on patterns so my python code inspector learning machine will recognize the repeating patterns found when opening and inspecting code

Code munki autist IOI