Post your true thoughts on our micro friend

Yeah, which amazes me cause doctors and the media ain't saying jack shit about quiting smoking/vaping.

Attached: Global Famines.jpg (1024x580, 72.01K)

without it it would be 4x as bad.
our leaders were not prepared.
surprisingly the only people who took it seriously was the Chinese.

i got fucking scared when i saw how the chinese handled it.
>dr questions the government
ummm people don't ever question the government for fear of being rounded up
>dr dies
>the people get upset
>ummmmm THE FUCKING SHEEP NEVER QUESTION THE GOVERNMENT AND THEY NEVER GET ANGRY AT IT
>government does a shutdown of an entire city. 11.08 million fucking people
>government does this on chinese new year
it's the equivalent of having martial law because on new years eve because a few people died over an unknown virus.
they arrest anyone outside
they weld doors shut.
the government APOLOGIZED (without technically saying im sorry)
fucking creeped me the fuck out when that happened. they knew it was going to be bad.

2 months later and Trump is still making jokes about it.
there are world leaders who are in denial about it.
6 days ago Brazil's far right leader was still calling it a hoax.

This lung damage rumor has yet to be proven. From what I've read, it's based on 12 cases which is a ridiculous amount of people to come to any valid conclusion. It never should have been published until many more cases have been studied, we have enough hysteria, thank you. It's almost as if the powers that be are determined to make this bigger than it really is.
businessinsider.com/coronavirus-recovery-damage-lung-function-gasping-air-hong-kong-doctors-2020-3

Comorbidity. Never heard that one before.

Here, this is for you.
youtube.com/watch?v=SH3WU5DPxwA

Attached: 1528175962972.jpg (578x691, 81.81K)

well law of averages.
if it's something that affects your lungs to the point where you can die from it sure some people will have lung damage.

cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/12/08/swine.flu.attack.lungs/index.html

>Post your true thoughts on our micro friend.

Thanks OP. I have so many and they're probably all contradictory, but here we go

> Will it cause any second thoughts, or perhaps first thoughts, among those who want to import foreigners by the millions and babble mindlessly about how diversity is our greatest strength?

> For the record, I didn't vote for Trump because I thought he'd be a fantastic manager in times like these. I voted for him because I don't want to fucking overthrow stable governments abroad and import millions of foreigners here.

> In the end, this will be a good practice run to
> - make more robust supply chains for medical necessities that don't depend on single factories in Puerto Rico for IV bags or masks in china
> - streamline vaccine creation / testing
> - businesses should create WFH business continuity

> We're acting like this is a fucking polio or TB outbreak. . . in the end it might be less deadly than the fucking flu.

He's a pretty cool virus, he infects people and doesn't afraid of anything

>> We're acting like this is a fucking polio or TB outbreak. . . in the end it might be less deadly than the fucking flu.
> We're acting like this is a fucking polio or TB outbreak.
so...like taking precautions
>in the end it might be less deadly than the fucking flu.
so...like taking precautions is working

Bioengineered plandemic. And we're going to find and massacre all involved.

I don't agree. There are too few people in the study to come to any valid conclusions. That's simply bad science. I'm tired of models and numbers. The US has roughly 8,500 dead right now. Do you actually think that number can increase to 240,000 dead in the next few months? No other country has come close to this number and they're months ahead of us. I believe there's a lot of exaggeration occurring, people have a strange need to make things bigger than they actually are.