So essentially morality is subjective and entirely contingent upon the beholder?
Atheists do not believe in morality. Prove me wrong
essentially. which is why it has always changed from different historical eras
Atheists are already in hell. They are the most miserable, unsatisfied, ungrateful and arrogant people you will ever talk to.
I hate niggers.
How would you know? Are you an atheists, or are you simply repeating what your church leaders tell you?
My point exactly, because their perception of morality is as fluid as the times, could an atheist argue that morality exists? If morality is subjective, then there does not exist any morality. Two parties can argue for contradicting codes of morality. This does not make them both legitimate. If someone argue that opposite codes of morality are equal, then they must argue that no objective moral code exists.
>shows stats regarding the opinion of the non-religious and their levels of satisfaction
>how do you know?
Are you just being ironically stupid or were you just born that way?
no, there is no objective morality. which is why people have been fighting over them for 1000s of years. all we can do is hash out the best system possible to allow society to function
This fact also crosses international borders.
Because man does not obey an objective morality or misinterprets it, does not mean it does not exist.
That's like saying that man developed misunderstandings of gravity and acted upon them, ergo gravity does not exist.