Paedophilia is a sexual orientation

Paedophilia is a sexual orientation.
Prove me wrong

Attached: 1582699483293.png (347x517, 277.39K)

cant have a sexuality that doesn’t pertain to a certain sex

Doesn't matter what it is, it's a toxic poison to society and should be violently purged.

also doesnt matter what you call it all pedos should die

Tell that to people who enjoy beastiality, faggot.

Only problem with that is that kids you know don't stay kids so it's not

Children can't consent

True but bruv

kill yourself fgt

Attached: chips handon.jpg (625x469, 26.36K)

Sexual orientation is all behavioural conditioning so yeh it is but it's still shit to take advantage of the vulnerable regardless of who you're attracted to.

It stems from lack of brain development

You fuck anyone when you were a teenager? Because I fucked other teens and it was legit. All seemed consensual when she took me cock out and put it in her mouth. Bad argument is bad.

Nobody is going to point out how close together this goofballs eyes are? If he had vision issues he could get by with a monocle

>also doesnt matter what you call it all pedos should die

If they dont offend and get help they are fine.

It just means you find some youths pretty, it's how you act which determines if you are pedophile.

It really is not such a big deal when restrained by choice, some women are attractive too.

Attached: 3gBuVOk.jpg (600x600, 63.29K)

You said pedophilia, not ephebophilia

they are sick, they need help

Why not?

No, they should be purged, they are a cancer, and it's behavior we shouldn't tolerate as a society. A broomstick boyfriend is what's best for them.

Attached: 1577802602237.jpg (1024x1024, 151.19K)

>Pedophilia (alternatively spelt paedophilia) is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to **prepubescent** children... A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

It’s illegal. Prove me wrong

Attached: 85924F6D-C312-4B64-A348-1202E70B03FE.jpg (638x638, 77.64K)

They don't understand what's happening

Pedophilia is harmful to children, even if it's done 'consensually' because it scars them mentally so they grow up damaged.

That being said 15 year old and older should be legal to have sex with or marry.

Attached: this.gif (300x186, 445.96K)

>this

How do you know that?

This guy keeps my pc safe!

Because I didn't understand sex until well into puberty, and that's what everyone else says was their experience. Plus all of the people who were molested and have psychological trauma as a result

The law says otherwise

i think there are more sick people in the world needing more urgent care than some kidfuckers who will never change their ways. gfy enabler

All arguments used against pedophilia are just repurposed arguments used against homosexuals. "Muh morals" is always so tiresome.

I eagerly await the day that genetically modified humans are so advanced and normalized that natural heterosexual reproduction is considered child abuse and straightfags suffer discrimination.

>A person must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

this seems like a cop out. Some studies suggest that our minds are wired as such that, while we can develop sexual interests in new things, old things we were attracted to still appeal to us.

Meaning, if at 11 you developed sexual interests in other 11 year olds, a decade later, despite your interests growing and changing as you grew, a part of you still sees an 11 year old and thinks "she's hot."

so, attraction to minors is either pedophilia, no matter what age you are, or every person who was attracted to a minor when they were a minor harbors secret pedophilic attractions, and hides them behind emotional walls of guilt, shame, self hate, and the relief that they have sexual desires outside of minors.

maybe if you’re attracted to kids and dont want to be punished for “having thoughts” maybe ..... keep them to your fucking self?

not helping fellow pedosapiens shame on you

>comparing pedos to gays
die

"if they don't offend" implies they don't prey on children.

If you take issue with people who prey on children, why should those who don't prey on children also die?

You first.

>All arguments used against pedophilia are just repurposed arguments used against homosexuals
No, consensual sex between adults of the same gender is not the same as an adult fucking a prepubescent, you fucking mental patient.

consider: i have no empathy for someone who is so desperate that they have to prey on kids to be aroused

Don't you see the problem with what you just said is the whole point? Other people experience things differently from you. I really did understand reproduction and safe sex from about 12. You don't get do decide what my experience was.

it isnt an attraction based on gender.

there done.

and while i’m at it, the only sexual orientations are straight, gay (male/female), bi or ace.
demisexual and sapiosexual are not valid orentations either

this

What if i prefer chicks with cocks?

Attached: coomer.png (317x487, 53.43K)

I'm a pedophile and I made the "muh morals" argument here: Just because you desire something doesn't mean it's right. Moral exist for a reason.

People who put their sexual desires over their morals, and seek self satisfaction over their empathy for the harm they do innocents, are dangerous.

When people say "all pedos should be killed," it's because of people like you. And I find myself agreeing with their sentiment, when I see people like you, take positions like that.

Children can not consent.

no, im saying if you think about fucking kids dont go around announcing you wanna fuck kids regardless of wether you’re offending or not.

>Some studies suggest
[citation needed]
I was sexually interested in 12 year olds when I was 12. Now I'm 36 and people under about 25 look like kids to me

you're contradicting yourself

dont all chicks have cocks ? I sucked my gf dry last night, she is 8 inches.

No.

The argument made was
>If they dont offend and get help they are fine

you replied with>i have no empathy for someone who preys on children who have no concept of sexual acts and behavior. kys pedo apologist

You said that even non-offending pedos, even those who seek help, should die.

Nowhere was the subject "non-offenders who want to openly express their desire to fuck children."

So you're a pedo who thinks pedos should be killed? Why are you still here then?

It depends. Do you like the ones that look like beautiful females? Do you want to be on the receiving end? Do you want to suck the peepee? If the answers are yes, no, and no, you're probably just a heterosexual deviant.

I'm convinced that asexual is actually demisexual and they just don't get it, probably because they've never been in a relationship

pedo eat pedo

>maybe if you’re attracted to kids and dont want to be punished for “having thoughts” maybe ..... keep them to your fucking self?

Fuck off SJW.

It's how gays reproduce

Fuck off moralfag SJW.

You are a good person.
Thank you.

>But having an orientation does not mean it is OK to act on it.
>"I am attracted to X" does not equate to "It is morally acceptable to have sexual contact with X."
>Homosexuality is unnatural. They don't understand sex, sexuality, the risks of sex, or the purpose of sex.
>I have a sexual attraction to men. I have for my whole sexually aware life. I don't know where it came from. I never asked for this. I didn't nurture and develop it. It's simply part of me.
>So, what should I do? Go out and find a sexually frustrated man in the age range I'm attracted to and push/pro/encourage/bribe them to do things with me?
>No. That is wrong. It is immoral.
>There is no way to act on my sexual interests in a moral way. The fact that I never wanted to be this, and that I see it as an "orientation," does not make it a legitimate desire to act on.
>"I am attracted to X" does not mean "I have the moral right to fuck X."
>You are attracted to men? Then do the right thing: put your morals ahead of your sexual desires, and stay abstinent. It really isn't that hard to manage to not get laid.
Fucking retard didn't get a word I said. Barely changed your damn diatribe. The only contention with any merit is differences in brain development. There's arguments for and against, but that's a can of worms unto itself. The rest of this garbage is just posturing, self-hate and smokescreens.

Where living on a generation that went from fat hairy sweaty 40yo truck stop tier stick books, to limewire and early Yas Forums. Me personally i wanted to see girls my own age, the dumpster fires who look like the last thing they inserted was a shot gun of the 90's-00's internet was repulsive.

Attached: 4744904.jpg (320x240, 12.7K)

I'm a pedo who thinks that pedophiles who forsake morality and think they should have a right to rape children, because morality is subjective and just being used to oppress the pedophile, should be killed.

Here, let's try a simple comparison:
Straight men exist.
Rapists exist.
Some women claim that all men are rapists or potential rapists.

Pedophiles who never offend exist.
Pedophiles who rape exist.
Most people are all pedophiles are rapists or prospective rapists.

If a man can chose to be a person and not an animal, and not simply rape every woman he desires, couldn't a pedophile, equally, choose to be a person and not an animal, and not harm children?

Aren't the people who would call all men "potential rapists" just lunatics?

by the same margin, if you see a man who rapes women and makes arguments about how any straight man should be able to rape women, and that the morals that hold it back are bullshit, doesn't that piss you off?
In that moment of disgust in him, don't you see some reason why some people might think "men disgust me, because maybe they do all think like that?"

You want rapists to die. You what pedos to hurt kids to die.
So do it. But as a pedo, that doesn't mean I've ever hurt, or ever will hurt, a child. Just as, as a man, I don't assume you ever have raped, or would rape, a woman.

>All these moralfags on Yas Forums

GTFO pedos are cool and Yas Forums has always been pro-pedo in 2007 we has CP threads everyday on Yas Forums you newfags are a bunch of little crybaby bitches.

Attached: 1487531694611s.jpg (250x185, 4.41K)

Why does that even need to be said, that should be an obligation to take em out, should even get paid for it like a bounty.

This

Isn't it common knowledge that girls dick falls off during puberty

Attached: 6d2fe83437ef38f733d3974110dc8880.jpg (1000x925, 99.32K)

But muh morality

>Do you like the ones that look like beautiful females?
Yes, but they also need to have tits
>Do you want to be on the receiving end?
Both ways
>Do you want to suck the peepee?
That would be a no

Welp. That was easy.

Attached: Capture.png (704x671, 98.15K)

just remember defending pedos only gets you cool points in Yas Forums bud

>Fucking retard didn't get a word I said. Barely changed your damn diatribe. The only contention with any merit is differences in brain development. There's arguments for and against, but that's a can of worms unto itself. The rest of this garbage is just posturing, self-hate and smokescreens.

I was replying only to OP, so unless you're op... no, I didn't get a word you said, as this wasn't directed towards you.

If you are OP, then the only thing you said was that pedophilia was an orientation.
Which I agreed with.

And everything I said just relates to my moral framework. Applying morals to explain why you shouldn't be allowed to have everything you want is not a "posture," "self hate" or a "smoke screen."

It is what makes us humans instead of animals. We can see something we want, understand that there are valid reasons, but personal and social, why it would bring harm to pursue it, and to choose to leave it alone.

At least you managed to hone in on the one difference of importance. It only works once you approach it form a biased set of assumptions, though. Why do you assume that trauma is from the sexual activity and not the culture surrounding it? It wasn't hard to find homosexuals with trauma related to their orientation. It was very prevalent among the ones that felt the most shame over it. How much of a child's understanding of sex is limited thanks to shielding them from the very concept? The differences aren't as black and white as you may think.

There’s a big difference, genius. You are not capable of having a non-rape relationship with a child. Period. The vast, vast majority of normal men have ordinary, consensual relationships

Well, I suppose that view is "muh morality."

I have a fairly strict personal belief in what is right, and what is wrong, and it's a line I don't cross.
I don't believe in hurting others for personal gain, and thus I despise people who hold a contrary view.

Similarly, I despise shunning and hurting others for having horrific world views, so long as those views are not put into action. Meaning I oppose though crimes on every level. Only actual action should be punished.

Don't be a cutie pie

WTF is that picture?

The concept of "sexual orientation" and "psychiatric disorder" do not exist outside of human definition.

Meaning, people recognize these things, and define what falls into which category. There is no empirical, provable way to assign them. The act of defining these characteristics is purely opinion.

Homosexuality used to be seen as a disorder. Then it was redefined.
The fact that some group classified something as belonging in a group does not lay the basis for a counter argument as to why it should not be redefined.

>You are not capable of having a non-rape relationship with a child. Period.

THIS THIS THIS