Loli thread - First Amendment edition

there are words. and they seem to form sentences. but there no message in there.

stop writing BS

The rights of children come before your rights to sexual indulgence and self-expression. Your rights are protected by legal alternatives such as lolicon and materials made with youthful looking adults.

Attached: 1564332187435.jpg (1196x2079, 1.31M)

Attached: 4bccfc53fed083bfe355d30a513f68fe.webm (520x440, 1.93M)

>child sexual abuse
I deny that all adult-child sex is abusive
>the market for CP is dependent on individual, real-life instances long term physical and psychological abuse in order to exist.
That is categorically false. First of all, you’re using the term “market”. We hear law enforcement tell us from time to time that child porn is billion dollar industry. If the harsh criminalization of the mere possession of child porn were intended to cripple this industry, then that it is a goal that it has clearly failed at. It begs the question of whether destroying the lives of citizens can be justified on the basis of a failed strategy. But besides that, why is there any market at all in the internet age? Imagine if it was legal to share and possess it. Imagine if there could be cp threads on Yas Forums, and if there was a pedo pornhub. With so much freely accessible material, why would anyone spend a dime on cp again? This “market” now only exists because its illegality can be leveraged to force purchase. Finally, what about the material that already exists? There is cp that is many decades old, some that is even older than anyone in this thread. Can obtaining such old material in any way truly be construed as contributing to “child abuse”?

Attached: 071a71d7423566a83f780c2aad8d489f.jpg (706x1000, 90.97K)

Source?

The bit about older cp is something I wonder about too. What about Brooke Shields' playboy shoots when she was 10? She's like what, 50 now?

In what way does masturbation to an image of any kind harm anyone, let alone children? We are not talking about children, we are talking about 1s and 0s in a computer, pixels on a screen. When a pedo is fapping to cp, there are no children involved in that act, if you ignored what exactly is on his screen it is not discernible from the masturbation of anyone else. And again, the depiction of the rape of adults is not so criminal as child porn. Why do their rights not matter? Because these laws are not based on protecting children, they are intended to persecute pedophiles.

Sexy little girls

Attached: 1538082932180.jpg (795x1122, 317.21K)

Sex is not something that needs to be protected against, just the opposite.