only if you are retarded.
Is it wrong to legally own a machine gun?
I support people owning guns, such as just semi auto rifles and handguns, I dont see anything wrong with them and some places where you live where police can take over 5 minutes to arrive, having a gun is necessary. But I dont think people should own full military grade weapons, really too dangerous and I know that a majority of people are not going to be able to afford such a thing or get access to but its pretty fucking dumb to own such a thing.
No.
Although this has a lot of merit to it.
retard alert.
Anyone that wants a machine gun is exactly the kind of person who shouldn't have one.
imagine caring about something as old and archaic as a machine gun. we have so much better people killing devices nowadays.
are you afraid of butterfly knifes too?
If you legally own something it is not legally wrong. It may be morally wrong though and that includes objects beyond firearms.
no, not if u stick it up ur ass
This post is talking about "legally owning" a machinegun. No member of the military owns the weapons they carry or use. You can however own a machinegun as a US citizen if you have the proper license and the machinegun was registered with the ATF prior to 1986. Its fair to assume we are in the civilian context and I believe machinegun is a commonly understood and used term to define firearms capable of full auto fire.