The absolute lack of evidence on either side of the "muh god" argument persuades me that one side is probably right

Proof of God is what is required to move him out of Religion and into Science.
Religion requires Faith (the illogical belief in something that cannot be proved).
Science requires Proof, the handmaiden of Truth.

Now that you've answered your own moronic question start over and try again, and try to keep your answer to your question while you take another stab at what I already said.

Multiple gods exist?
Gods defy logic and exist and dont exist at the same time in the same way?
cant come up with any more.

>Multiple gods exist?
already covered in option 1.

Reading comprehension: F

retarded red herring.
to tell me that there is a pantheon, you should be able to prove the existence of any given one.

there is no functional difference between the existence of one god or more.
only between n gods and 0.

was just humoring him, there are no other options, idk what he is talking about.
Did you not see the question mark?

Evil is subjective, so God is subjective.

Both don't exist. Very practical.

I hope you will be able to keep that in mind in case somebody rapes you and cuts of one of your fingers afterwards to keep as a souvenir.

>Gods defy logic and exist and dont exist at the same time in the same way?
are they omnipotent, omnipresent, and allknowing, the creator of all things and in controll of them (maybe in summary as a group)?
no?
then they aren't gods.
Just some more advanced beings, whereas self-awareness might be an attribute they could lack, too.

so nope, doesn't makes it onto the list.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. I never claimed the universe is commanded by a zombie jew magician.

I'm not arguing that God exists (work on your reading comprehension). I'm arguing that objective evil does not exist and therefore Epicurious is just spouting irrelevant gibberish rather than contributing to the debate/discussion