They're correct that female sexual selection created a propensity toward competitiveness itself in males, however, they're not correct that every individual male uses that natural propensity for a woman's sake. Unrelated, but it also would have been possible for the female itself to take up the dominant role, but this would have rendered males utterly useless in every way, so I think it's overall better this way.
This is the ultimate cause men has fought uncountable wars, build civilizations, raise monuments...
Nikola Tesla Isaac Newton died virgins
good funny post, i lol'd
Yeah. I'm attracted to fertile, developed women and not infants you low test pedophile.
gottem, kek'd
>This just looks like a baby pussy or some shit
M-Masaka!
uuuuhn huih uuuuuuuuuugh uuuuuuuuuugh
ugh
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGH UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHM UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUHM UUUUUUUUHM UUUUUUUUHUHUHUHUUUUUUUM
the greeks didnt but okay
Thanks for the link, big redpill. But how about some nerdy guy who spends all his life studying, researching, inventing shit and not giving a shit about women or sex. Does sublimation apply to this case as well?
sfb\sfb\ bkaCJc