Why do robots refuse to accept the immortal science of Marxist-Leninism?

I live in Russia and on myself feel everything that Marx wrote - huge inequality, the people is literally getting poorer, fusion of power and capital

>Because you said?
Because literally every modern serious economist thinks so. Keynesian or Monetarist; they all agree that LTV is useless. Because history has shown that Marx was wrong; even in Marxian time the living standard and wealth of the poor improved despite Marxist predictions that the rich would get richer and the poor will get poorer as a result.

There is a significant debate as to whether or not the term capitalism is even useful or even describes an actual tangible phenomenon. The ability to own private property, own the means of production, make profit etc... these things existed in various forms within Ancient Greece, Rome, Persia, and China.

Leave that dirty ideology in the 20th and let it rot in the dustbin of history where it belongs.

You have been down this road before Sergei... your country is fucked because of mega corruption and the bizarre neo-feudalist oligarchy system Putin set up. Also, sanctions from the Us and NATO counties and a complete over-reliance on oil and gas.

If you cunts could just set up a free market, let go of your dumb ambitions for global influence to stop pissing off the Americans (they won the Cold War so fucking deal with it), fix your corruption culture, stop blowing so much of your national budget on the military and invest in some infrastructure etc...

I like communism because it makes the normies suffer the most and no one gets freebies for being a chad or having a vagina (I mean not as much as in capitalism where stacy gets a CEO position for wearing a tight blouse). But of course that would mean I'd have to put up with the same bullshit too and I'm not sure I'd like that

Fuck communism. This is a technocratic board.

If you think that race is essential then you simply aren't a Marxist, you didn't understand it. Sorry

>Marx supposes, like Hegel, that history is unfurling and has a natural progression
Most marxists would agree that this was wrong. But capitalism and the economic system at large do have certain tendencies which aren't going away.

The progression of technology will one day make labour optional, which inevitably leads to socialism in the final instance

Indeed. A more fair form of capitalism will do for this lifetime.

>not into "to each according to his needs" style ascetic living.
That isn't what that quote means. It's an assertion that use values (i.e. the qualitative uses of commodities) should be what guide the distribution of goods, not exchange value as now, which means that plenty of people can't get the use values that they need

>we will never reach some utopia end point
Almost certainly correct, there will always be a politics, and there will be no 'end of history'. Man constitutes himself in opposition to others, thus opposition is inevitable. However, once commodity abundance is achieved, questions of distribution will be much easier to solve.

Do you actually know what "technocracy" means?

>Because literally every modern serious economist thinks so
literally all scientists believed that phlogistons exist
>even in Marxian time the living standard and wealth of the poor improved despite Marxist predictions that the rich would get richer and the poor will get poorer as a result.
its very stupid to think that peoples needs were defined at the beginning of the nineteenth century and should remain the same
>There is a significant debate as to whether or not the term capitalism is even useful or even describes an actual tangible phenomenon. The ability to own private property, own the means of production, make profit etc... these things existed in various forms within Ancient Greece, Rome, Persia, and China.
individually perhaps, but not all together

>Marxists are materialists that only care about money and see humans as gdp units of production.
Change "marxists" to "capitalists" and you would actually be right

Capitalism is making the world better, and will continue to due so until inequality reaches a tipping point. Capitalism is better for now, but that will change eventually.