Vegan question thread

do you think animals have moral status?

what do you think about philosophical veganism?

do you think the way we treat cows pigs and chickens in industrial farms is morally acceptable?

what would be stopping you from agreeing with it or adopting a vegan diet?

do you think adopting a vegan diet is an effective way to reduce animal suffering?

do you think its hypocritical to care about ethics for yourself or for other humans, yet disregard ethical issues for animals?

Attached: moral status.jpg (1542x530, 208.14K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=9WW8JdCLngI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_consciousness
fcmconference.org/img/CambridgeDeclarationOnConsciousness.pdf
psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/animal-emotions/201711/cows-science-shows-theyre-bright-and-emotional-individuals
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/jul/07/cows-best-friends
peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-food/factory-farming/cows/hidden-lives-cows/
news.nationalgeographic.com/2015/07/150714-animal-dog-thinking-feelings-brain-science/
sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/04/150428081801.htm
livescience.com/39481-time-to-declare-animal-sentience.html
theconversation.com/heres-what-the-science-says-about-animal-sentience-88047
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I'm fucking tired of your vegan posting

Attached: 0E41DFFC-0148-4A5D-8131-663BB6E8AB51.jpg (720x793, 35.13K)

ah, so you think the endless threads of gays, trannies, orbiters, race baiters and girlfriend threads are better?

are you saying my threads reduce the quality of Yas Forums?

Attached: cognitive dissonance.png (1092x1052, 113.59K)

is it ok that humans eat animals: yes
is it ok how we treat them: no

we should only be allowed to eat animals we killed personally, if you want to eat animals you didn't kill yourself it should be fucking expensive as hell
the main problem though isn't us eating animals though, its overpopulation: if we were only 100000 humans on earth things would be better for all.

Attached: 1587311362091.jpg (283x178, 6.51K)

take your shitty philosophy one step further and admit that all living beings are inherently selfish by necessity and thrive at the expense of other living beings

It's not about board quality, you're just a broken record

>take your shitty philosophy one step further and admit that all living beings are inherently selfish by necessity and thrive at the expense of other living beings

does that morally justify doing anything we want to then?

is it morally acceptable to rape and kill children because we thrive at the expense of others?

is it morally acceptable to enslave other people because we can benefit at their expense?

how am i any different than most of r9k? you know there are over 1000 gay general thread in this cesspool. and you havent adressed any of the questions i asked in this thread, why is that?

Attached: morals and ethics and hipocrisy.jpg (1266x1268, 259.85K)

>we should only be allowed to eat animals we killed personally

so is it okay for me to kill dogs and eat a tiny bit of it, and throw the rest out, if i killed it myself? lets just say i only like eating dog tongue, and i throw the rest out, does that make it okay?

is it okay to kill chimpanzees and gorillas if i only eat 1 of their fingers and throw the rest out?

Attached: image_3_3292.jpg (768x576, 112.13K)

it means that to live is immoral

so you are appealing to futility?

you are basically saying, "since by the act of being alive, some squirl had to get its home cut down for the hospital i was born in, so its futile to try to be immoral, so we can be as immoral as we want?"

would you people torturing and killing dogs or children on that argument?