Dear young 20-somethings

yeah even a good willed commie fag will just get killed by some lenin or mao. communism never works and is arguably the worst idea in human history

Thats ridiculous, because:
1) If you are poor and an incel in today society, you would be ultra fucked.
2) Classism has nothing to do with sexual appeal.
Incels will always be incels, independent of the system you implement.
The best you can do, its making their life easier and fair, to at least being able to contribute to society without being marginalized.
NEETS itself always complain about the inability to get a job. Its ridiculous something as vital as the the way to earn your living is becoming as stupid and rare as it its today (and it will become worse)
3) > incel revolution
Top kek

In capitalism, I can have a useful skill and even if people dislike me as a person I can still make a good living because my skills are valuable.
In communism, if people dislike me then I'm shit out of luck, the state bureaucrats can simply refuse to let me into the breadline and I will starve.

The poor incels in modern society aren't the ones who would rise up, they have no motivation or ability. The rich genetic rejects are the ones who would be organizing the riots.
2) yeah it does, it's just one example, classes will form based on physic traits if there's no money

> communism
> state
I wont even bother with a serious reply, because you didnt

Economical inequality would be non existant at that stage. You could argue popular and motivated incels could do something...but I cant stop laughing before continuing that fantasy.
But lets play with the idea: Do you see rich incels doing anything to improve their public image even today? And they have the resources and power yo do it.

> class
Not user, class is a pure economic definition, bases on their role in the production process.
Maybe you could argue from an id pol point of view, bit it wouldnt be a "class"

You can't have communism without a state. With no state to enforce communism, people will be free to engage in commercial enterprise.

The term you are seeking for that state in the marxist process is the Dictatorship of the Proletariat, where there would be a state that would enforce the redistribution.

But again, thats not communism. In a communist society theres no state, and thats come after that.

>In a communist society theres no state, and thats come after that.
Meaning people are free to engage in commercial enterprise, because there's no state.

You're retarded. Buy some good growth index funds and ETFs right now, you have the perfect opportunity to do so, and DO NOT sell. Don't even look at the price until the coronavirus has passed. It might go down more but you'll make a profit in the long run. Coronavirus is an opportunity to be taken advantage of.

The problem is that how could you do it un a commune where the resources and the products are socialized?

At best you could engage in barter, that in a sense its already the base of the commune, but nothing that would be similar to what you define as a comercial enterprice.

Again, the abesence of a state doesnt mean a community would lack ways to police themselves, but it would be very different from the system you have today.