Dear young 20-somethings

>The problem is that how could you do it un a commune where the resources and the products are socialized?
The majority of the population would choose not to be a commune. The resources and products would, accordingly, not be socialized.

>cucked by 9/11.
I didnt even know what 9/11 was until ten years later. I thought there was just a massive and campaign to raise aw as redness for 9-11

>2008 crisis
Idk what this is about. I know a large amount of people loss their jobs but that's about it.

>women bad
Just go for good women then.

You may have to work harder than your peers, but big whoop. Our loves are super cushy. We arent expected to be in wars. We arent forced to work labor jobs or oil field work etc. We have internet, interactive media, our childhoods were some of the heists cuz we were around in the 90s and early 2000s when money was flowing and tech was evolving super fast. I feel like being born 90-2000 was the best.

Nothing stops that from happening (in reality communes will of course fail for different reasons).
The problem is how you make it attractive to abolish a system that benefits all, and try to enforce one where only a minority gets most of the benefit.

We also have to keep in mind that this system goes hand in hand with progreso and technology, the lack of resources to justify that kind of regressions become more dificult and rare.

But continuing the idea: given that communes wouldnt live in isolation, if one would change their model and prove more successful to bring happiness to all, its natural that it would spread, and if on the contrary they fail and try to bring harm to the others, its logical they would unite and enforce peace.

>The problem is how you make it attractive to abolish a system that benefits all, and try to enforce one where only a minority gets most of the benefit.
Because it doesn't benefit all. Quality of life is much higher with a market economy.

Compared to what?

Im not a tankie user, I dont defend anything about URSS, Cuba or China.

We are moving forward to a world were tech alone will be able to satisfy all our needs, do you want them to be at the hands of a few or for the benefit of all? A system that works by greed its self destructive.
And you dont to look away far: look how this crisis impacts places without public health, how the most fucked by this are the ones that cant afford to be safe un quarentine or how the ones at the top gamble with the lifes of the ones below them to keep their wealth growth.

>nigger shoots you in the back of the head for your money

Get grounded in reality with your utopian bs and look at the systems of passive control out there. I for one dont want the consoomer feedback loop to continue existing be it in capitalist or any other system. Whats the point? 19th century technology can satisfy our needs just fine. Either you drop playing into the hands of techno plutocrats and demagoguery or you become a normie whos content with serving a system which doesnt care and never misses its interest cut.

>"Too young to be a millenial"
>describes how he is exactly a millenial
>"Our chances at a decent job were miniscule enough"
>Just had the lowest unemployment in 85 years and 2 years of the first real wages growth (even with inflation) on 45 years.
>"Who is going to fix it?"
the battlecry of the loser

Attached: 1543856229880.gif (320x240, 1.99M)

All Commies are one of
A - Morons
B - Fools
C - Retards
D - Evil
E - Weak
F - some combo of the above

>its your fault wages have stagnated and the cost of living has risen arbitrarily since the 70s!!!!!!!!
>if you didn't devote your whole childhood to studies and do everything right, you deserve homelessness!
>PULL uP YouR BOotStrapS YOUnGFELLOW
>WE'RE TOO OLD, TAKE CARE OF US TOO
>OH AND PAY OUR WELFARE
>WHO GONNA HELP ME FEED THESE KIDS???
>TOXIC MASCULINITY

and people wonder why schools are getting shot up. they're fucking stupid, that's why they're constantly wondering and can't figure anything out, they're the problem.