IQ Test for Voting

i do not understand why does a box being squished make something seemingly totally unrelated

>using a single 50/50 question to gauge iq
I think you're the retarded one here user

Moving things cant have portals on them
>b-but that one bit in Portal 2

Straight up IQ testing for candidate selecting isn't helpful.
It would be like IQ testing for deep sea divers.

People should have to at least compose one 20-page well sourced essay on the history of their country's politics, tie it in to the significance of the present-day election, and explain how it will affect their own life. Or at least demonstrate an understanding of these points orally.

If baby boomers had to pass a history course on the history of labor conditions in the 19th century, the American communist party, the sit-ins and protests of the early 20th century then maybe they would have appreciated their incredible union jobs in the 60s instead of thinking they earned their amazing lives by "workin' real hard". What a fucking dumb generation.

I agree with your method in spirit. The problem is if the "correct" answer to that thesis is falsely biased, it can be used to intentionally select for candidates that agree with whatever the status quo is. IQ testing in theory is orthogonal to any political biases, and will give you a population of people who are capable of making rational decisions. A person who can make rational decisions but is ignorant can be educated (and quickly at that), while a person who can't make rational decisions but can memorize information is just a slave who will inevitably be manipulated by other actors.

It's B. Pic related is my analysis and I'm legitimately curious what the gap in my logic is if I'm wrong. Basically I don't think normal conservation of momentum applies in this case because the space is discontinuous.

Attached: unknown-2.png (813x1001, 1.26M)

based user, B it is

Partially applying this universes physics to a virtual one is wrong user. You rely on conservation of momentum in pic related, however portal demonstrably violates that same principle when axes of the portals aren't aligned. They also violate conservation of energy. Any proof that tries to establish the behavior of the cube has to formulate a set of assumptions that defines the behavior of the universe which contains them. They will all run into contradictions because our universe doesn't support portals in the way portal does. There is no reason to believe that the cubes velocity will avoid a discontinuity just as it's position did. The way you would determine this, in a universe which supported it, would be through observation and experimentation to determine that universes physical principles (which quite clearly couldn't be the same as ours).

The real answer would be determining what the video game rules would have the cube do. The cubes velocity is stored relative to it's resting frame of reference and thus it won't move when a portal moves through it. The correct answer is A.

I'm pretty sure they're quantum tunnels not wormholes

How does the gravity in both portals affect the box? Does the floor absorb the top panel's impact? What would happen to the portal if it broke through the floor and kept going?