8 Values Thread

>Orbiter faggot needs his ideology name handed to him on a silver platter to him by a website
kek

Sounds very based and original.
Democracy has turned everyone into normies

Well,sure it is a fag move complaining about not having instant results.However,it does give at least a general idea of what ideology you should look into to supplement your beliefs

why the fuck else am i taking the test. "OoOOoOoO my bars!!!!! oh wow 56% federal! glad i took that test! wow!!!" just give me a label you faggot.

Attached: EVAbUD-UUAY-UT3.jpg (1536x2048, 462.48K)

"A multitude of rulers is not a good thing. Let there be one ruler, one king."

- Homer, The Iliad

Exactly,modern democracy has descended into chaos.Its not the cool and based idea that the Greeks made. The congress has devolved into commies and larpers.Time for an authoritarian leadership.
And a question to the people here that advocate for an authoritarian government.Do you want British style absolute monarchism.Italian Fascism.Or NatSoc?

literally a cuck LOL
i dont have any kings bro i dont got no rulers im my own man

Sounds like shitposting or just fake and gay anarchism to me

even the greek idea wasn't good desu, plato can tell you about that. id like a monarchy but there would need to be some checks in place so he doesn't go crazy.

i bet you jerk off to the NAP, there will be a place for you

Yes I advocate for an authoritarian government with traditional family and societal values in mind,how could you tell

Authoritarian here, personally I'm a big fan of Pinochet. Monarchism is a bit too archaic, and NatSoc is just racist commies.

idk what the NAP is
>
imagine being so cucked u cant even comprehend someone just doing there own thing and not giving a shit about authority or politics

>Libertarian faggot
>Doesn't even know what the NAP is
>Uses the wrong "they're"
Retards like you will be the first against the wall when the revolution comes

Ive always been interested in the works of Hitler and Mussolini myself.However.your idea about monarchy with checks sounds like a based ideology.But how would you deal with the whole heir to the throne thing?

idek what libertarian means but i do know some larping faggots on r9k arent gonna do shit LOL

Yeah Pinochet was a based leader who totally cucked the world who was trying to get him in court.Getting back on track with your support for Pinochet,he did wonders for the Chilean economy and threw communists out of helicopters. I agree that monarchism may be a bit dated,but Ill have to disagree with your stance on NatSoc.They advocated for a traditional society with a few extra steps.Think Finlands economy mixed with 60s American society

You're all retarded amoral cucks. Long live the revolution.

Attached: download (1).png (800x650, 112.74K)

Were at a point where you have to care user,shit may get real it may not.But its important to care about society and government and related things.But if you dont want to care about any of that live your detached larping libertarian life

>libertarian socialism
what are you 13?

Sounds like you just did that 10 minutes ago and chose all the leftists answers,but ok.

I won't bother taking it again, I already know the results
Equality/International/Liberty/Progress
Fashies begone

well it could be hereditary, thats pretty simple. or you could have an elective monarchy. probably best to have it hereditary though. and if you mean like, murder and stuff, well thats just life eh? the leader of any system could be assassinated.

What im talking about is how do you preserve the monarchy if all the heirs are a bunch of inept faggots. Poland got fucked over by a string of ineffective kangz and look where it got them in the middle ages.They went from a cultural golden age to the most cucked country in all of Europe

People who think that libertarian socialism is impossible or unfeasible are retarded. The implementation of direct democracy practically guarantees the realisation of libertarian socialism.

Libertarian socialism involves reduced government but free shit.
The thing is.you need a big massive government to provide for your free shit utopia,which is the antithesis of libertarianism

well, poland is fucked for alot of reasons.

but to answer your question, off the top of my head - this seems like a problem for any leader of a country; what if their inept? hopefully youd counteract with with various cabinets and advisors, youd have multiple children, a good education, certain constitutional rules in place preventing them from going full aspie and declaring war on everyone, or maybe the king could appoint one of his ministers in charge instead of his down syndrome son, i dunno im going off the top of my head here.

disgusting coomunist

Attached: Download.png (800x650, 96.1K)

like, my mind just wants to go to all the chinese dynasties that lasted fuck ages. maybe the answer to your question is confucianism lol

Agreed,geography is a pretty big reason Poland got cucked,and some faggot neighbors but i digress.
And I also agree with your explanation of having cabinets advisors and constitutional limitations to prevent the monarch from going apeshit.And having the king appoint a trusted minister instead of downie son does make a lot of sense.Excuse me while I make a call to the based department

Attached: BasedDepartment.jpg (410x598, 39.54K)

Perhaps confucianism might be the answer in a political sense.However,the application of Confucianism to common society is likely to encounter push back by people who say "hurr durr chink religion get out reeee"
But to reiterate,having the political system function under a confucianism based dynasty of kangz does make sense.

yeah, it would need rebranding - just use its other name; ruism. or no name at all. i wouldnt want to be totalitarian with the culture, but rather teach these morals and values in highschool. so maybe from grade 10-12 they read the Four Books and Five Classics and we call it a day. then have the top government operate under such values and tradition, have it leak down somewhat

Wrong, it does not require "free shit", it requires egalitarian distribution policies (which would of course occur if the working class are in control as in direct democracy).

Distribution to everyone=Free Shit

>direct democracy
lol

Teaching it in school sounds quite based,and actually fits in with some of the Christian values many parents want taught in schools.

here 9axes

Attached: Download (5).png (800x1200, 208.88K)

Seems based enough
In an original way of course

This is what I got. I have no idea where it would be on the compass, though.

Attached: download.png (800x650, 106.35K)

I would say anywhere within the square area of (4,4) on the compass

Attached: PoliticalCompass.png (400x400, 15.29K)

Damn, wish it was a little more libertarian.

here the other political compass forgot its name

Attached: nazbol gang.png (999x629, 62.84K)

Oh I see you just have a poor vocabulary with which to express yourself. "Free shit" then.
Anyway, you're a retard who clearly doesn't know the first thing about direct democracy, but I'll try to educate you. When we say direct democracy we usually do not merely mean sortition (although a state which merely selects its governmental bodies through means of sortition would be preferable to our current state and realise libertarian socialism to an extent), we mean to give people individual political rights which allow them to tangibly affect and influence politics. We also mean to have a very large proportion of the population actively participating in politics. In order to achieve this, the destruction of the state is necessary, because the more people who can affect a decision, the less their individual powers; so politics must be brought to a small scale, and cities must become self-sufficient and autonomous, becoming their own states. In such a city-state, if the people decide to share resources, nothing is going to stop them; they easily have the means to give such a small population "free shit". Hopefully this has made you aware of your ignorances to an extent, brainlet, and if not then I'll suggest you read some recent political philosophy on the matter, instead of dulling my mind by engaging with your retardation any longer.

Attached: 1582403549872.jpg (960x720, 60.38K)

"Free shit" is a catchall term
And fuck direct democracy.
Libertarianism has failed and socialism has failed
Think about the Kansas Experiment and pretty much every country that was under communism

8 values is fucking bullshit

I am a libtard haha

Attached: 8val(PNG Image, 800 × 650 pixels) - Scaled (98%).png (800x650, 84.19K)

Communism is an economic policy. Every communist nation thus far has had terrible political systems, they've mainly been dictatorships. Their political systems failed them, not communism.
And direct democracy hasn't failed; the main example of direct democracy in the past was of course athens, and athenians lived extraordinarily happy lives, and waged war with the persians and the spartans admirably, only in the end being destroyed by the armies of alexander the great. Direct democracy cannot be considered to have failed because athens was eventually conquered any more than literally every other political system can be said to have failed.

A very mega ultra original
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Attached: AAAAAAAAA.gif (233x226, 850.26K)

>Every commie country thus far has been dictator ships
Well theres your problem,youre trying to implement a system where everyone is stuck in one state and can advance no further.Obviously theres gonna be a guy whos gonna take charge and become the leader.And besides,all the modern communists you see are larping as soviets,so theyre going to want to have authoritarian communism.Your primordial,pure communism is just another failed utopia project

Yeah sorry but that's all bullshit, stop pretending like you know how people react to every given situation retard.

>not communism.
socialism sucks but real communism hasnt been tried yet
thats what amerijews try to tell you the soviet union worked well and was the strongest country with america

I never said that I know how a person will react to a given situation.Im just going off the concept that every known communist country has centered around a single leader.Therefore theres no reason to not think that future attempts at communism wouldnt produce similar results

i consider myself an anarcho communist.

Attached: Screen Shot 2020-04-09 at 12.22.23 AM.png (1646x1320, 457.66K)

definitely in the blue

lol, imagine not understanding that there is both an authoritarian communism and an anarchist communism.

All lefties,later faggots.
Im going to Yas Forums
Pic related is definitely me

Attached: 1581012837836.jpg (887x1024, 90.08K)