Why are so many people brainwashed enough to think it's a good idea to remove hair that naturally grows on their bodies?

>It's either itchy or smells.

It's the polar opposite for me. After i shave i itch like hell until its all grown back and whenever i dont have that bush acting as an airy pillow i sweat/smell like crazy.

taking a shit is natural too, and no one wants to see it

women have been removing hair from their bodies for thousands of years, and we have naturally sexually selected for less hair as we have evolved

so no, we havent been ''conditioned'', we naturally find it unattractive

hairy women turn me into a goddamn APE. OOG OOG I WANNA SNIFF HER HAIRY PUSSY AND PITS THEN IMPREGNATE HER

No matter how much flesh I scrape off my arm pits in the pursuit of clean and fresh smelling arm pits it just doesn't seem to make a difference, so I shave them.

Armpit hair is a huge turn on, pussy hair only on top and not near the hole so you can properly lick it
Leg hair is disgusting tho

Ok pedo.

>thousands of years
Only in civilisation, which is unnatural and created by beta males.

>anyone who doesnt obey my hairy woman fetish is a pedo

kek

you would be executed in any primitive or civilized society, fag

It's not my fetish at all, I just say what is right.

Body hair is a sign of sexual maturity.
There are no downsides to it.
In fact, it can serve as protection against certain parasites and more.

But no, all that hair must be removed, which also wastes time. All that to appease your numale pedo preferences.

its a sexual fetish you have. which is why you are lashing out like a retard at anyone who disagrees with you

and you can rage about what is natural all you want, but you still wont be able to change the natural human impulse to remove said hair. history is on our side :)

>There are no downsides to it.
Try working out for once in your life you greasy fatass

>tfw she has more testosterone than me
40 years on this rock with barely any body hair.

Women think we are pedos and shave their legs and armpits and pussy.

I think all people should shave 100% of their bodies. Pit and leg hair on men looks nasty too

I do, multiple times per week.
Still, no downsides.
I don't understand why you gay boys need to shave everything.

Why are so many people brainwashed enough to think it's a good idea to wipe away poop that naturally comes out of their bodies?

Why are so many people brainwashed enough to think it's a good idea to wash away sweat that naturally comes out of their bodies?

It's called personal hygene, dumbass. A person who can't bother to shave their legs every month probably doesn't bother to wash more than once a week, let alone clean their ass properly.

I see you went full retard.
Not even animals in nature are dirty, nor smelly, so why would humans be?

On the other hand, no animal removes their hair.
Sure, a lot of them naturally shed in the summer to handle the heat, but that's it.

Human sweat has a purpose, it is to cool us down.
The smell from not washing is just a side effect.
Your ass being dirty from shit is a side effect (though it wouldn't even be dirty with a natural diet, as the shit would be just hard enough to leave your ass clean, there are people who shit like this even today, you can look it up).

On the other hand, body hair is just there.
It is not a side effect of anything.
Simply grows on us, just like head hair.

I don't really give a shit desu, kinda find hairy armpits hot though. Looks a lot less dirty on a blonde though, not a shitskin.

>animals in nature are dirty, nor smelly
Have you ever met an actual wild animal?

Because body hair, besides making you look like a caveman, traps sweat and makes you SMELL BAD.

women shave their legs because some white men in the early 1900's noticed women were ditching victorian era fashion and wearing more loose fitting clothing and realized if they convinced women to shave they could double their profits so they started targeting women heavily with advertisements.

A similar thing was done with men and deoderant. It was seen as a feminine product. They started targetting men and using celebrities etc.

They did the same thing with toothpaste.

lol babby mad no one likes his gross fetish

women have been shaving their pussy since 3000bc you utter moron

>makes bullshit claims
>gets angry at some random guy on Yas Forums

Attached: 385.jpg (317x267, 12.43K)

why you laughing bro?

why dfo you cut your toenails when they grow naturally user? Don't worry about them breaking its all natural you filthy modernist

Attached: 407691242906976277.png (118x128, 24.01K)

I'm sure there's some girls right now who would rather let it all grow out but feel forced to shave because everyone else is doing it.
That being said, not every girl is like that and there's plenty that just would just rather shave regardless of what other people think. It's not hard to imagine that someone would find it unattractive all by themselves.
You're also hilarious for going full on REEE whenever someone disagrees with you.
And I see you're also ignoring the fact that hair was important when humans weren't wearing as much clothing as now, it might have been a good evolutionary trait to have, but not anymore.
Using soap or shampoo in the shower isn't 'natural', washing your hands with said soap isn't 'natural', like some other guy said: clipping your toenails isn't natural.

Ah yes, the only defining thing on a woman's maturity is the ability to grow leghair, etc.
You call everyone pedo yet girls as young as 10 years old start going through puberty and start developing excess body hair, so what are you saying? We're supposed to be attracted to those little girls at 13 because they have leg hair? YOU are the one who's disgusting.
I don't mind a little bodyhair on females, but not a bush on their legs like the girl in the first pic. She almost has more hair on her shins than me.

Because they grow infinitely and are meant to be "spent" in nature.
Body hair is always the same size.

Wouldn't expect anything less retarded from a literal weeb faggot.

>We're supposed to be attracted to those little girls at 13 because they have leg hair?
Lol, imagine being this retarded.

Leg hair is just one of the signs of maturity.
People develop all of the signs gradually during puberty.

However, preferring people to look more like prepubescent children does seem like a sign of pedophilia.

Even if they were to get 'spent' in nature, they still wouldn't look at all appealing or clean and probably longer than what most people are rocking when they clip their nails.
What is this? An attempt to be progressive? Yet you tell someone with what might have been a counter-argument a literal weeb faggot?

Because cultural standards what looks good or not.

Although, I had a women's studies professor (yes I took a women's studies class) who had "research" claiming that lack of hair makes one look more youthful, and that attractions to hairlessness is because of how much younger it makes the person look. And another professor (painter this time) saying that hair reminds us of our biology, making it less appealing aesthetic-wise.

This autistic latching onto your pedophilia idea is hilarious.
Alright, so my sister still doesn't grow a whole lot of leghair or bodyhair at 20, anyone who's attracted to her has tendencies of pedophilia? You're severly autistic

>progressive
Lol dude.

Listen, just because feminists like something, it doesn't mean everyone else who approves of it is a feminist.

Even a broken clock is right twice s day.
That's it.

You don't need to validate your preferences by calling everyone who isn't in the same boat a pedo or someone with tendencies of pedophilia.
Most people are going to disagree and would call your fetish disgusting.
However if you like it, go ahead, no one is stopping you. But don't act like a bratty child when people disagree.
The fact that you lack any self restraint on calling anyone who disagrees names like pedo/faggot/... doesn't show a whole lot of maturity, you have no business in telling what is mature and what isn't.

No, it's fine.
It's just that exclusively preferring no body hair, and being disgusted with it, is a possible sign of being a pedo.

You're taking this shit too seriously.

You are wasting your time. Let autistic body hair enthusiast user wallow in his own uncleanliness alone. His ear hair is so thick he will not listen to you trying to reason with him.

Yeah, I'm the one who started a post about it and is furiously attacking everyone disagrees.
So what do you think about females growing their upper lip hair (which is completely natural)/moustache?

>It's just that exclusively preferring no body hair, and being disgusted with it, is a possible sign of being a pedo.
No, liking kids is a sign of a pedo. Not traits that are erroneously associated with children.

No I think we should agree with him, I'll stop trimming my nose hair/ears/etc. Because it's natural and I'll call every women who thinks that it is disgusting a pedo because this excess hair comes with age and is a sign of maturity.

Again, don't take it too seriously.
I just enjoy fucking with numales.

>upper lip hair
I feel neutral about it, unless it's too big or thick, which implies hormonal imbalance.

That's how I feel about leg hair too - neutral.
You keep insisting that it's my fetish, though.

Personally, I am a guy who doesn't shave anything.
I do trim my beard when it gets too huge, because it grows infinitely long, though.

Believe it or not, I just want women to feel free and be able to accept their natural bodies.
Most women feel pressured into shaving their legs, armpits, and so on.
Due to the way our culture is (brainwashing), people would look at them weird and judge them.

>Again, don't take it too seriously.
>I just enjoy fucking with numales.
By acting like a child? Whatever makes you feel better.
I also find it hilarious that trying to come up with solid arguments in order to fuel a proper discussion is considered as being too serious.
You expect me to just start screaming retarded dweeb faggot at you then?
>I feel neutral about it, unless it's too big or thick, which implies hormonal imbalance.
I didn't realize you were a doctor aswell. You seem to have a lot going for you user!

>Body hair is a sign of sexual maturity.

t.virgin retard

>By acting like a child?
That is one of the best ways to spark discussion on Yas Forums.
Tell me it didn't work.

>I fucked a fat girl once, and she was shaved, so scientific facts must be wrong lol
Ok man, I take everything I said back.

That's why I don't shower, don't wipe my ass and don't brush my teeth. It's unnatural.

You're going to be jumping for joy once your gf/wife hits 50 and the 'stache starts turning really coarse and thick. Good days to come user!

Also, have you considered that all this excess hair on e.g. the upper lip, legs etc. Might just be considered manly instead of immature? And that men have been going for feminine features all along? Look at the praise of 'thick' women some 1000's of years ago and now

>shower
People used to wash themselves in rivers and so on.

>wipe my ass
With a natural diet, a human doesn't need to wipe their ass.
Shit just doesn't leave anything behind.
You just told me that your diet sucks. Cool.

>brush my teeth
Again, you wouldn't need it in nature.
Most old skeletons still have intact teeth.
We didn't evolve with the modern diet, and our teeth can't handle it.
That's why you brush them an go to the dentist.

>brush my teeth
Again, you wouldn't need it in nature.
Most old skeletons still have intact teeth.
We didn't evolve with the modern diet, and our teeth can't handle it.
That's why you brush them an go to the dentist.
Ahh, more BS from Dr. user
Research has shown that cavemen may have had a better dental hygiene than we currently have, they didn't leave their dental care up to nature, but ok.

>People used to wash themselves in rivers and so on.
So? Does not mean that we have an implicit need to shower.

>With a natural diet, a human doesn't need to wipe their ass.
Wrong again, also "natural diet" is a useless term since food in each region will be different, produce including fiber isn't distributed evenly.

>Again, you wouldn't need it in nature.
Except the times you would need it since you yourself admitted that not every skeleton had intact teeth.

>better dental hygiene
I meant dental hygiene routine

It's only seen as manly in the modern oversexualised culture, where everything has to be extreme contrast.

Men do have much more body hair on average.
A woman who has as much as a man couldbe considered manly/boyish.

Of course you can find photos of hairy as fuck women on the internet.
But generally, women are not very hairy.

And also, I can only think of one single woman that I know who actually has a beard and shaves it.
It's not full beard, more like a teenage boy neckbeard.
She does have children, so she probably doesn't have a significant hormonal imbalance.

Besides, the modern society sometimes encourages men to shave body hair.
Isn't that too womanly by your standards?