If any of you smooth brains pick the rats you deserve to be thrown off a bridge handcuffed

Animal kingdom rules: wolves and hunter.
No where for the Crocs to survive near me, male lions are lazy fucks, bears won't mess with the wolves, gorilla and bulls won't either. The rats will mostly kill each other and the Hawks will feast on them too, hunter and I will clean up.

I would like to argue but quints don't lie.

Remove the rats and hunter and this is a better game.

Then I would choose the gorillas and bulls. I think the bulls could handle the 3 bears while the gorillas took care of everything else.

I pick one trillion lions and the sun

I'm going with hawks and crocs, but checked.

10,000 rats is OP.
rats and hawks

good luck shooting 10.000 rats before the eat you alive

Can I pick bears twice? They will fuck absolutely anyone up.
A bear could easily kill a lion in one smack, especially polar bears.

Straight up, even 100 rats would be pure cancer.

I'd imagine picking the rats and quickly reproducing them. I'd double, triple, quadruple my numbers quickly.

What would the rats do against the eagles?

Then just side with the rats

The only thing capable of BTFO’ing 10,000 rats and not getting swarmed are the hawks. They can just sit on trees and go kill a few whenever they want and the rats will lose from attrition. That’s why It only makes sense to pick rats AND hawks, so the rats don’t have to fight the hawks and can just kill everything.

Unironically two guys with a gun could kill anything on that list or at least scare them away.

Barring that the lion is the ultimate apex predator. It is a perfect biological killing machine due to its quick reflexes and claws that can rip peoples heads off. The bear is also a great choice and would probably be the only thing on that list that could effectively counter a male lion or even two guys with shotguns (though in the latter case it is very unlikely)

People really do underestimate guns in a weird kind of way. They are the ultimate equalizer in terms of killing power.

Bears and lions would fuck everything else up. sorry.

>Yas Forums

>Barring that the lion is the ultimate apex predator. It is a perfect biological killing machine due to its quick reflexes and claws that can rip peoples heads off. The bear is also a great choice and would probably be the only thing on that list that could effectively counter a male lion or even two guys with shotguns (though in the latter case it is very unlikely)

jamie pull it up

Attached: roe jogan.jpg (434x378, 18.14K)

quints of christ support my first suggestion.

but... fuck... these 10.000 rats tho... may God have mercy with us, wolf-bros...

At 50 hawks and 10 000 rats this would require each hawk to dive 200 times successfully. Rats can jump, if one rat gets on a wing when a hawk gets close and start biting, the hawk is done for.

In the rare cases that giant cats have been shown to confront gorillas in nature, every single time big cats come out on top. Male lions (and tigers) are literally designed for combat. It is their sole purpose to confront other male lions and fight to the death or scare them away.

Gorillas, while way stronger than humans, are surprisingly peaceful and don’t even eat meat. Most of their territorial disputes are resolved with shows of strength and intimidation. That’s why there are so few videos of gorillas fighting because they really don’t do that unless they have to. IIRC chimps have actually killed way more humans in the wild than gorillas have. Lions and tigers have them both beat. One rogue lion alone killed hundreds of people and required the British Empire to send a skilled hunter to track him and kill him.

The funny thing? I did research on man eating big cats and in almost ALL cases (man eating animals are very rare) the big fat (jaguar, tiger or lion) suffered some kind of debilitating medical ailment that prevented them from hunting their normal prey. Examples are things like broken paws, rotten teeth or missing eyes. A big cat with a severe impediment is still deadlier than literally dozens of humans and only a single human armed with high powered technology and trained his whole life for a sole purpose can actually kill them. Also, perhaps rarest of all thankfully, the deadliest creature is the rogue elephant. Rogue elephants are notoriously difficult to kill even by skilled hunters at least in the 18th century.

This is all very rare though. Insects kill far more humans than big cats or bears because despite being territorial most of these creatures would rather not deal with something like a human unless they feel especially threatened.

t. Like biology and have a fascination with the european Great White hunter of the 19th century.

Skaven and hawks.

No they literally cannot. Lions are THE terrestrial apex predator. Educate yourself.

Hawks seem useless, i though maybe if all 50 landed on you they could pick you up, but Google says they can't carry more than their weight and a BIG hawk is 1kg.
Me being 80kg makes me invisible to hawks
Gimmie gorillas and hunter

10,000 rats. Do you know how many 10,000 is you fucking smooth brain thats an insane amount of rats nothing on that list could withstand that wave of biomass

>People really do underestimate guns in a weird kind of way.

At least with the bear, you need a high caliber, which might be a huge disadvantage against the rats. Also if the hunter is just a basic dear hunter without experience (which is highly possible) he has an actual problem with lions, eagles and gorillas.

Also for the rats you need a weapon which has lots of ammo without the need to reload, so no hunting rifel. Obviously a hunter has no explosives in most cases.

It's video game rules, doesn't matter if they are peaceful. Their sole purpose in like is to attack or defend you

The only correct answers are 1xhuman and 3xbears.
>bears will kill 7 bulls on their own it’s not even open for debate
>human will kill the crocodiles (single shot to the back of the head but it has to hit the kill spot, so I’m assuming my human is a god with guns since you pictured one holding a gun)
>3 bears could easily gang up on 15 wolves and be relatively undamaged, a wolf would need to pin a bear and be able to chew into it to actually cause damage because it’s fur skin and fat are made thick enough to defend against bear bites and claws
>human and bear kill lions, gorillas, eagles and rats together. Bear tanks and breaks the bigger animals like lions backs/cripples them in other ways like damaging limbs while the human picks off the ones the bear has it’s back turned to. I’d also be fighting because why would I just sit around when I can shoot too, that’s a whole extra fighter on my team
The rats will be the most difficult because 10000 rats could easily swarm two humans and three bears, although I imagine two humans with or without guns could easily kill a few thousand rats and 3 bears could easily kill 3000 each just by mauling and not allowing themself to get overtaken

Okay but even in life and death, objectively based on observable facts, a gorilla is inferior in combat to a big cat. Big cats are quicker and have claws and teeth. Gorillas are strong but not meant for fighting a big cat as they rarely come against each other in nature.

are we talking like dishonored level, massive rats? because yeah its absurdly unfair to have 10k

Eagles have to get within range to do damage, unless they are dropping rocks, and even then they need to come down to pick them up.
Rats can jump on and swarm them.

How can you be so wrong? Male lions rarely hunt. Tigers and polar bears blow them out as predators, and a Kodiak would demolish a lion.

>wolf-bros

Attached: 1582303134979.jpg (600x616, 44.8K)