Additional videos and reading on benching, squatting, deadlifting, bands, accessories, etc., can be found in the pastbin.
>Trips PRs Pastebin pastebin.com/xqFCG4t9 pastebin.com/2VTGQFN3 (ORIGINAL PASTE WITH OLDFAGS)
>Programs not totally shit on every thread Sheiko Hepburn Blevins Skynet AI The Bridge Smolov Jr. The Cube (+ Predator) Juggernaut Method 2.0 Destroy the Opposition 5th Set
Why do gymcels insist on making their quotes sound dumb by putting the word “fuck” in them?
Brody Sanchez
Why don’t you let people talk how they want
Benjamin Mitchell
Smolov and Smolov jr should be shit on every thread desu
Hudson Miller
It's make me laugh thinking about the mid 00's and early 10's American powerlifters like George Leeman and Brandon Lilly talking about how much they sacrificed and how much pain they were in trying to be the best and now their best numbers are completely shat on by people 100lbs less than them
Nicholas Anderson
Why?
Joshua Thomas
Have you ever done them or read through them?
Parker Brown
no and im trans btw if that matters
Samuel Evans
No and no Care to explain in two sentences?
Connor Barnes
Yes, great meme that will add a lot to the conversation. We appreciate it.
Brayden Brooks
>12 hour work shift to do >no break >had 2 chicken fillets before work >now done work >having a few beers >work again in the morning is it worth eating the chicken i have now for recovery for sleep, or bringing it to work tomo to recover during the day with no alcohol in the system? not really hungry so doesn't matter either way lol
I keep hearing this shit over and over again when someone tries to explain success: From the left: >Muh privilege From the right: >Muh effort From the far right: >Muh genetics You have to understand that a combination of multiple factors leads to success in any area, a theory I call partial causality. You COULD be limited by any of those factors, or by your program, your stature, your parents or whatever.
Working out at home is much more fun than I anticipated.
Henry Howard
Is that uh-huh one of sarcasm or understanding?
Sebastian Smith
It's the uh-huh one of I can't tell what's wrong.
Joshua Gonzalez
bench press is the best gauge of RAW PHYSICAL STRENGTH. you only downplay this because you're a pudgy, weak little shit of a manlet with an equally embarrassing bench press.
nobody gives a shit that you can bounce your morbidly obese gut off of your legs for your little bullshit wide stance "squat". nobody cares about your 5 inch ROM sumo "deadlift".
You don't see anything wrong with 4x frequency for squat/bench and adding 5-10 lbs for week 2 and 10-20 lbs for week three with:
70% 6x6/75%7x5/80% 8x4/85% 10x3?
Lincoln Howard
Too many sets at too high of an intensity would be my guess. Or is it too fast of a progression? >inb4 jewptimizer
Aaron Nelson
It's both. A lot of people that run it get injured.
Justin Russell
That's what I figured, I could imagine it being okay for somebody who's weak though (maybe if they have the work capacity).
Jace Campbell
And that's where you'd be wrong most of the time. Because if they're weak then likely their form is bad, which with this much work, will also lead to injury
Cooper Evans
The key is to determine which factor is holding you back, by logical analysis and not some biased heuristic. It has to be determined how much of an outcome is explained by a given factor. Fags who don't understand will play a game where they set a value to 0% and then to 100%, then say that their favorite single factor determines who succeeds. Arnold and Jocko: >Bro 0 hours of work gets literally nothing done and 1 million is really likely to generate success.
A reductio ad absurdum: P: All good athletes have a functioning pancreas P: All people without functioning pancreases are dead and therefore not good athletes. ----------------------- Conclusion; Pancreas function is the only determinant of athletic success.
Obviously this conclusion is false, but swap out privilege, hard work, or genetics for pancreas function and see how many people argue like this.
Logan Cox
+ for weak people the addition of 5-10lbs per weak, is a far greater difference in intensity vs those who are pretty strong
Noah Mitchell
Well that's not a given. What about somebody who's coming back after a lay off? >inb4 why not just do SS Obviously that would be better, but I doubt smolov would be that bad still for this particular demographic. That's why I said that.
Nicholas Rodriguez
Are you guys recommending I remove Smolov from the OP?
Ryder Jackson
>It's make me laugh thinking about the mid 00's and early 10's American powerlifters Be better. Not bitter.
Jonathan Martin
That's why I said most of the time. However, Smolov jr after a long period of time off lifting will probably injure you because your movement patterns aren't consistent
Yes
Carson Richardson
Who said anything about being bitter?
Alexander Torres
>After a long period of time To agree with you, your recovery/adaption would be way beyond Smolov. You'd be back to minimal work, and anything over that directly increasing recovery time, and fucking it up with the smolov volume. Why do it all, when 3x5 3x a week works?
Austin Perez
I refuse to believe that it's shit, which seems to be what you're implying. I think I'll give it a shot when I'm on a big surplus again just to see it for myself.
