How do we fix this?

>That logic applies both ways, get rid of the gays and there will be no problem with gays.
You are literally too stupid to understand what you type you leftist shitbag.

Serious question from someone who is more /lit/ than Yas Forums: why the fuck do online liberals eat up and oversimplify this one argument by Karl Popper? American liberals and leftists worldwide typically fucking hate the analytic school of Western Philosophy, and most of their shit is continental.

We stop hiding it.

>homosexual culture indirectly causes intolerance
Are you talking about the fact that other people hate gays? Because that's not even remotely the same argument.
>gays openly encourage pedophilia and openly hate straight white men
I cannot argue with this because we have data that shows us it isn't remotely reflective of reality but you truly believe it is. You swallowed the Yas Forums propaganda hook line and sinker. I'm going to disengage from this argument now.

Straight culture indirectly causes intolerance.

Also heterosexuals are some of the most bigoted people on the planet, they blatantly encourage pedophilia and openly hate straight white men.

I don't know who karl popper is, I'm not very /lit/. I only read pre 20th century european philosophy.

>Because that's not even remotely the same argument.

It absolutely is the same argument.
You can't act like a huge faggot and then blame other people for not liking you. Even if you feel the things you are doing are not immoral, they are still unethical due to the sociological repercussions and harm they cause.

what you said can apply to what you believe as well

More proof that women ruin everything. Sorry that the big bad man wouldn’t give you his squat rack so that you could do your booty blaster thottercises. That doesn’t make him a Nazi though. Fucking idiots.

The paradox of tolerance was put forth by Popper in The Open Society and Its Enemies, which is his most famous work by far.

The problem I see with this is this the argument was made within the analytic framework, it is a fundamentally positivist argument. Everyone from Nietzsche to Heidigger to Marx etc, would deface the argument in it's very basis, that the action/behavior of a mind/person/ego is not something that can be distilled into a fact with a truth value.

Buying into the argument without buying into positivism just leaves you open to a million angles of attack on the premise. It's hard for someone who buys into socialism as a moral good to have to defend existentialist arguments on one hand, and this analytical argument on the other.

Like almost every other article "calling out" SJW percieved problems, there is no citing any instances, naming any names or providing -any- levelnof evidence to support their position.
As such I will continue to denigrate morons who post shit like this.
I don't give a fuck if you're Baghdad Bob, the Hassidic Home boy or adolf fucking keckler himself. Lift the god damn weights at the meet, place, accept any winnings that come your way and leave.

Attached: 1586430318118.jpg (270x140, 11.32K)

>Also homosexuals are some of the most bigoted people on the planet, they blatantly encourage pedophilia and openly hate straight white men.

What in the love of fuck are you talking about? I think it's time to get off the internet.

Ok, i see what you're saying. That's a reasonable critique

Shut up fag. If you can't come up with a better argument than a Nazi than maybe the Nazis are right.

Eh, you'd be surprised. Lots of the analytic school is utilized such as Wittgenstein. You can't really draw party lines on analytic and continental. If you want I can go into further detail but there is a reason they do use Popper.

The problem with this "tolerance paradox" talk is that tolerance is not a virtue, it is an action.
It's healthy to tolerate things that are good, and to be intolerant of things that are bad.
If you prop up "tolerance" as a virtue in and of itself, the only practical effect this can have is to allow and permit things that would otherwise be deemed bad and therefore not tolerated.
If you want to convince me to tolerate something, you should convince me that it is good for society, rather than propping up tolerance as a universal virtue.
When leftists use the word "tolerance", they are usually referring to tolerance of things like sexual deviancy.
So, convince people that sexual deviancy is neutral or good for society.
But I have the right and duty to be intolerant of things that are bad for society.

"I'm going to disengage from this argument" is left lib speak for "i have no argument against this so i won't talk anymore"

He doesn't claim to say anything about the mind of anyone involved though. He simply states his logical conclusion that, to ensure the survival of tolerance, the tolerant must be intolerant of intolerance

He probably got turned on and went to go beat his flaccid meat to some underaged boys.

Liberalism is more intolerant than fascism.

Dumbest post I’ve ever read

LOL
people actually believe this
Hilarious.

>Paradoxically enough it is sometimes necessary to limit freedom to facilitate liberty
Spoken like a true redditor

>one group is actively racist and wants ethic cleansing
>the other just fucks people of their own gender

>we
Go back faggot

you should read your post again and try to comprehend the glaring hypocrisy in what you said. you can't police people's thoughts. you are intellectually LAZY.

if you disagree with somebody's ethos, make the effort to open a discourse and catch them in a contradiction or whatever. don't just BAN the idea because you dislike it.

seriously, go fuck yourself. i think nazis are fucking faggots but i'd never try to tell somebody how to think or speak.

I don't see that reacting negatively towards gay culture has anything to do with being a nazi no matter how much you fags wish you could label every straight white heterosexual man intolerant of homosexuality a nazi, they aren't.

Attached: programmingsocks.png (694x708, 536.11K)

>gay people aren't interested (generally) in silencing or oppressing other groups
yes they are
>Nazis are
no they aren't

>Paradoxically enough
this sounds like the preface to a jusitification for why the rule you made up doesn't apply to you

i want a million dollars. does that mean i should pay the taxes that comes with earning a million dollars? they aren't doing anything. nobody takes them seriously. just leave them alone.

the more you try to silence these people the more validated in their beliefs they become.

Great bait, bro. I've been competing for about four years and I literally have no idea what you're talking about.

Dont be such a jewish nigger, faggot

i can tell you bench less than 2pl8 from this post alone

Shut the fuck up COMMUNIST

bitchute.com/video/hGT2IL6SIRkC/

If you think you might be a Nazi give this a watch and see if you agree with it

be honest, you've never actually read karl popper besides some out of context blurb on Vox.

Actual good response, thanks

Only maybe nazi I know in powerlifting is that Brandon Allen dude. Guys straight up got 88 tattooed right across his gut and had a totenkopf on his hand for awhile before he got it covered up when people became wise to it.

The 88 he hand waves away cause he was born that year but who the fuck gets their birth year on them?

Who cares just focus on your gains, be a locust.

Funny that commies like quoting Popper cause he hated commies too

>He simply states his logical conclusion that, to ensure the survival of tolerance, the tolerant must be intolerant of intolerance
That's not what he says though. His actual words are:
>We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.
This is preceded by:
>as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise.
His point is that we should suppress groups if they use violence to promote their agenda, which is basically a moot point anyway, because we already have laws against violence.

liked and subscribed

>this post
>this thread

Attached: 1515271052580.gif (200x270, 1.09M)

Heres a video of me deadlifting 5pl8. Check description for proof.
youtu.be/Uh6D4sU31y4

That's a really interesting way to say that you want to suck my cock, user.

>oh no a small minority of people whose ideology is based upon physical appearance work out

Recruit, who has the informational pamphlets?

Yas Forumsfags lick my ass

Yas Forumsfags need a cool down before being allowed to post on other boards.

Most people who post shit like this would love to meet a real nazi (there really aren't very many, they're pretty rare). Self righteous SJW types have built themselves up as heroes in their own heads, but they need a villain to complete the equation. They can't live with living like some regular ass loser, so they lower the bar for what a nazi is until Joe Blow who believes that maybe kids shouldn't be introduced to overly sexual ideas from a young age now qualifies as a nazi under their new definition. Voila, now they have their villain and they can live out their little hero fantasy fightin' against them nazis

The ultimate and final redpill is just how low the bar will go. We know eventually conservatives will be labeled nazis, hell that has already started. But i firmly believe that in time even the liberal/libertarians parties around the world will get the accusation.

Antifa are definitely nazis.

Pretty much. We limit people's freedom to murder, rob, etc so people are able to (for the most part) be free from worrying about getting clapped without impunity.

Who knew there was actually someone on Yas Forums with more than three brain cells. Brilliant post user, dare I say based.