High vs low

Post squat. Also you know you can do wide stance high bar (if your hip morphology allows it) and you can go just below parallel, right?

Rip recommends low bar in SS, but I do high bar because I figured high bar works quads harder and I already deadlift a lot for hamstring/glutes. Am I retarded? I also want to try oly lifting at some point and high bar feels better for me.

i think people are making out a few centimeters of bar placement into way too big of a deal

Yeah

Do whichever doesn't aggravate any of your past injuries and allows you to feel most stable. For me it's low bar since high bar has caused many injuries for me (lumbar, hips, knees).

>mute point
Oh shit nigga what are you doing?

Attached: 1502885128820.jpg (246x200, 11.59K)

High bar was great for the longest time but my quads were outpacing my hamstrings and glutes and it was hampering my deadlifts. Switched to low bar for the longest time. Now I do low bar on full body split and high bar when I deadlift and squat on the same day so my glutes don't get tired.

You are fucking retarded and nobody outside of your sport cares about "muh proper squat". If you're not trying to catch 405 at the bottom of a clean you don't need the bottom range a ball-tickingly low squat would require. Squat below parallel. Simple as.

High, I switch to low near competitions, but I find that high gives me personally the most squat gains

Imagine hurting yourself squatting

Attached: 1578832206161.jpg (3072x2474, 671.18K)