This game doesn’t know what type of Mario game it’s trying to be

>a 2D Mario with a z-axis
so... a 3D game?

Where have I been proven wrong?

I've always thought of it as the true sequel to Super Mario 64

Who made a video about it? I want to watch it so I can seethe about how wrong he is.

>But it has a health bar and no time limit? Like Mario 64?
I don't understand how these are indicative of a sandbox game. That should depend on level design. Galaxy has a few twists there to my recollection but it is definitely a course clear game.

A good platformer has inertia. This game doesn’t have that. You’re constantly stopping and starting with going to different planets.

kys barry

This user hit the nail on the head. 2D mario games have flow and the 3D ones are slow and methodical. 3D world is 2D Mario with a Z axis because it has that flow.

>Doesn’t fully commit to one gameplay style
>Still better than every other 3D Mario game

Attached: 617B1596-F201-40D4-B9AF-D4A38C539784.jpg (500x700, 148.38K)

It’s indicative because Nintendo themselves designed the game that way with already having previous games going it like Mario 64. It has both elements of Sandbox and course clear. Linear levels but with the hub word style of 64.

It doesn’t know what game it wants to be. Period.