The visual fidelity and animation quality of Crysis 3 is absolutely insane for something that released in 2013 and was...

I really wish Crysis 3 had doubled down on the body horror elements from Crysis 2 instead of unreliable narrator-ing its way out of the corner with "I REPLACED IT, LIKE A SPARE PART."

Dude, you STOLE HIS GODDAMN BODY.

its not
look at RE5 cutscenes. those are top tier and are easily better than Uncharted but its get 0 recognition becuase Capcom wasnt a popular company to like back then

Motion blur is critical for this style of animation, and there's a reason the original Crysis has it. It's similar in other CryEngine titles like Prey 2017. The wrench just doesn't feel right unless it has that "whiiiip" blur effect as it passes by the camera.

Yeah, it would've been cool to see Alcatraz fighting Prophet's mind for control of the nanosuit.

Even heavily downgraded on consoles, Crysis 3's cutscene animation fidelity is light years beyond something like RE5.
youtu.be/DWWkuUlDHjs?t=4406

>talking shit about object motion blur
motion blur is absolutely critical for realistic animations, and has become a mandatory staple of tripple a titles.
>hur dur motion blur is shit xD
camera motion blur (can be) is shit, but not object motion blur which when used right can result in fantastic looks

Is Crysis 3 a fun game? 2 feels like shit to play

It's a lot better than Crysis 2, but also shorter.

Not that user but the faces in Re5 are definitely more expressive. Crysis 3 looks great but it's facial animations are incredibly stiff, even compared to older stuff like Half-Life 2.

Crysis 3 suffers from very unbalanced difficulty (too easy), but its level design is far more open than Crysis 2's. Chief flaw is being rather short (about 6 hours long), and the aforementioned difficulty balancing issues. Story makes a lot more sense if you've played Crysis 1+Warhead because it revolves so heavily around Psycho and Prophet.