What did it do wrong that the Sonic movie did not?

What did it do wrong that the Sonic movie did not?

Attached: RCposter1.jpg (455x674, 48.05K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qUk1t7SHpR0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

This was a thing?

Characters were wearing clothes.
Everyone knows the appeal of Sonic is that he's naked and has a gravity powered penis.

It paved the way for Sonic instead of the other way around

Ratchet >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sonic

Attached: EUnUCd8WoAEsjG-.jpg (1920x1080, 196.04K)

Ratchet and Clank doesn't carry the same weight in terms of success and popularity

Or autistic fans.

Sonic wasn't attached to what was considered the worst game in the series.

Let’s see... almost zero advertising? Nowhere near as popular or iconic as Sonic? Limited releases in theaters? Take your pick

it wasn't ape escape

COME AND BUY A PIXELISER

it has a shitty script

Everything:
>Dumbed down humor from the Future series
>Cliche story
>Ratchet and Clank having next to no personality compared to the 2002 original
>no advertisement
>celebrity voice actors
>a cliffhanger for a sequel that never came.

What makes it even more baffling is that the same writer who worked on the original game worked on the movie.

Sonicfags need to be gassed. Don't act smug like a movie is any indicator of success. There hasn't been a good Sonic game in years.

Attached: 1586385277084.gif (498x275, 2.43M)

Sonic didn't rape the lore of a already well loved story. It went original(ish) so it only had itself to fuck over.

There hasn't been a good ratchet and clank game in longer

Cope

Attached: s.jpg (554x554, 25.78K)

Sonic's humor was dumb too.

>sonic
>original
No. It's just The Smurfs but with Sonic.

I want a standalone Eggman game where I can live out my fantasy of being the worlds greatest cheesy-on-purpose villian.

Reading comprehension, user. He meant the movie did its own thing instead of actually adapting one of the games.

>retelling of Ratchet and Clank 1
>Ratchet is now a goodie two shoe hero wanna be and not some space hillbilly form the first game
They were targeting a younger demographic instead of fans of the original games. Nothing wrong with trying to appeal to a younger audience, but you can’t forget the original fanbase.

Attached: 1CEA1DF6-880D-41C0-8DA3-F385BBAA39E7.jpg (1079x850, 143.42K)

But it wasn't based on a previous game, unlike Ratchet.

is this cope?

Insomniac has always been a copycat company. They have no original ideas and their leadership will never allow for it.
Hollywood is all about sterile, safe production. They just followed the leader as usual.
Which is why I have NO faith for the inevitable PS5 title they are hypeshilling all over the place with.

Attached: ps1_disruptor-120314.jpg (640x643, 85.41K)

>There hasn't been a good Sonic game in years.
Well yeah, Mania and Forces were 2017. It has technically been years.

When was the last good Ratchet & Clank game again? Last I heard, Deadlocked was where it went downhill.

>What makes it even more baffling is that the same writer who worked on the original game worked on the movie.
Didn't he drop out and write a blog post wiping his hands of the project?

Attached: egeafljk73xz.png (656x2448, 425.13K)

Ratchet & Clank? More like Ratshit and Skank!

>using Forces, Adventure, or Unleashed as an example of a bad game
lol

Attached: lool.png (648x323, 70.5K)

Deadlocked is the last good one, once the HD series hit is when it started sucking
youtube.com/watch?v=qUk1t7SHpR0

Attached: Gleeman_Vox.jpg (639x357, 153.74K)

Nah it has plenty of those

Mania is better than any Ratchet and Clank game

Insomniac forgot what R&C is

?

Attached: BDD80341-1537-453D-A82C-E5249510F572.jpg (828x1174, 194.86K)

>muh critic reviews
Once you start leaving out the user score, you've lost the debate