I have never touched a single Resident Evil game and I don't tend to like the idea of remake since, even though I love graphical improvements, they tend to ruin the gameplay to make it "modern" and change the story to be as politically correct as possible.
I was watching comparisons and jesus christ the original ones look like crap and the remakes don't seem to really change the story, I don't like what hey did to Carlos in RE3, making him all niggerish, "hehe latinos can't be white silly" is racist af.
But the gameplay seems to have actually improved, unlike in FFVII in which they removed the iconic combat for a hack and slash.
Also how come there is no remake of the very first Resident Evil? it's the oldest and the most unplayable one, why RE2 and RE3 get the remake?
If you haven't played a Resident Evil game by this point, don't bother now. The modern remakes may have modern gameplay design, but the core design stays the same.
Easton Peterson
Oh then I'll just play the remakes. Look more like remasters to me since they don't really change the story. And I prefer the new gameplay.
Ian Miller
>Also how come there is no remake of the very first Resident Evil? Because it already was remade.
Evan Bell
The gameplay (as, the movement and shooting) changes but the core game doesn't. It's still the same mid 90's >Door closed, requires three objects to open >Search for objects >find the first for the second you need to find another object >The object required to unlock the second object is hidden behind a "press those switch in the correct order, some hints here" puzzle >Solve puzzle, keep searching for the third object >But wait, you ran out of space because you can only carry a few objects with you, gotta backtrack to the next safe vault to drop objects >After a pretty long walk you found the third object. Gonna make constant forward and backwards trips carrying the other two objects. >All while you're rationing supplies because they're few and the enemies are many >Unlocked the door using the three objects. Now you have to do the same on the next area >Repeat until the end of the game.
As I said before, the only people who enjoy Resident Evil are the one who started playing those games back in 1995. Now it's not worth the trouble.
Aaron Perry
The 2015 remaster? It looks good but it's nowhere near as good as the new ones. For a 2015 game it looks 2009. It's obviously an improvement from the original 5 pixel face but it's still not what we deserve.
Adrian Martinez
>For a 2015 game it looks 2009 You make that sound bad for a 2002 Gamecube game.
Jonathan Stewart
It's an amazing remake. It doesn't need to be remade again.
Justin Morgan
REmake 2 is great
Dylan Rogers
>Are Resident Evil Remakes good? REmake 1 (2002) is a 10/10 game, but it will be better if you've played classic RE1 (and preferably 2-CV). DEmake 2 and 3 are absolute garbage. Avoid them. They are NOTHING like the classics, and cut + fuck up everything.
I would honestly just play the classic games, from RE1 to 4, and call it quits.
Are you a moron? The REmake of RE1 was made in 2002, and it is 100 times superior to the original. The 2014 released version is a mere HD remaster OF that REmake.