>rome 1 engine has units actually fighting each other
>warscape engine has them in fighting animations instead
>combat can literally stop
Add to the fact that pretty much every warscape engine has no proper modding tools and you've got games filled with bandaid mods.
Why is Rome Total War 1 and everything built in its engine comfy...
Christian Lopez
Jeremiah Thompson
>Medieval 2 looks better than Rome 2 decades later
Cooper Hall
Very simplified campaign map, graphics honestly looked kind of crap, particularly compared to what they'd been promising before it came out. Combat devolves into humping amoebas, even more than the old games (which considering it was about 7-8 years down the line was a joke). AI still just charges right into phalanxes like retards. Battles literally last like 5 minutes at max.
Nolan Foster
Attila is the best "worst" total war.
Medieval 2 is the best "best" total war.
Debate me
Ayden Moore
I can't. Nothing can top Medieval 2.
youtube.com
Henry Walker
FPBP. Shame the series is completely ruined by the dogshit Warhammer ones now though.
Noah Price
Also Bellum Crucis is best Medieval 2
Aaron Rodriguez
very based
Jace Robinson
>2 is better
>only mentions graphics and UI
wew lad
>Warhammer 2 is both good and comfy
no
Eli Scott
>no
It is, also the most unit variety of any TW game which nicely sets it apart from the others. It's only crime is keeping the gay Rome 2 campaign map.