>It's no true RE game
Of course not, because it's actually good.
So, is REsident Evil 3 better than 2 from the last year or not?
evolve or die cunt, re4 is fantastic AND a re game
The setting of
>obscure rural village filled with mutated cultists
is wasted on re4.
Don't get me wrong I love re4, but it's an action game.
You could make an actual horror game in it as well, and I hope they do.
he's just pissy that they got rid of tank controls and he probably filled his diaper when they stopped using prerendered backgrounds and janky dutch angles
Never said it wasn't good. Shit like that should be illegal though unless they specifically state that it's a spinoff or just give it a new name.
>You could make an actual horror game in it as well, and I hope they do.
Are you hoping for a remake? I don't see that happening before 2030.
How would you have evolved the franchise?
Not even classic Castlevania fans were trying this hard to reject Symphony of the Night, what is it about RE4 that to this day makes RE classic fans so upset?
By re-branding it.
Why do you need to evolve a formula that worked.
Outbreak, a spin-off title exclusive to the PS2 that functioned mainly via online play, something Europeans didn't have, sold more than RE0 on the GCN. The reason 0, REmake and 4 bombed on the GCN was because the GCN was a baby's toy and they weren't buying RE.
Had Capcom not listened to Mikami's crying about Sony, the series would've done far better and Mikami's hissyfit that is 4 wouldn't have ever happened.