But an uncut cock is a lot more aesthetically pleasing. Sure, maybe they may not like the look of the foreskin being up, but you can just pull it down. Then you have a tender looking head that isn't scarred and you don't have a bunch of circumcision scars around the glands either.
Game's lore is more sinister than it first appears
>
Is that a real statistic about children dying from circumcision?
daily reminder that if the hospitals are clogged and you have a stroke that you'll probably die
>opinion from an individual
I don't really have a view on dicks, since I don't care about them visually. But there have been polls about this sort of thing where women prefer the other. Whether that's right or wrong is a moot point.
I'm not American. I live in a country with socialized medicine. Last time I checked, doctors still receive a salary and that money doesn't just appear out of thin air.
See what I wrote here:
The fact they make even more money off the circumcision would be an extra incentive to persuade new parents into doing it. Isn't the hospital the one profiting from the procedure?
>Depends on how much you cut off.
That's true, people have to specify.
>First off, no, it is not an emotional appeal. Second off, good for him if he got himself cut through his own decision
I don't really care what kind of point it is, I was just saying you ignored the point of his post. He wasn't defending the practice, just saying it didn't change as much as Yas Forumstards usually say it does.
>I asked them in very direct (and honestly accusatory) way "Why did you let some doctor cut off part of my penis when I was a baby?"
I dunno, the answer seems so obvious I would never ask. I didn't learn what circumcision really meant until I was 20 - it's not hard to envision people back then just not finding out due to reasons, sad as that is. I heard if you really want to lower the rates of it in America, you need to try and get it off medicare coverage, which is an interesting idea, since then not many people will go for it.
reporting in