Yas Forums

Yas Forums,

Apologize to "B-team". Now.

Attached: Untitled-1677898.jpg (1378x1041, 359.55K)

2 is the best in the series. 1 has terrible hit boxes, shitty programming all around that has you backstab an enemy only for it to fail but if they shove their sword through your chest it counts as a backstab. The boss turns 180ยบ and attacks and suddenly you're teleported to their sword and you're dead, and for some fucking reason they wanted the realism meme of hitting your sword on the wall every time you swing in corridors, despite being able to plunge attack a giant demon from the top of a skyscraper.

2 fixed all those issues and amped the difficulty as to balance things out, thus, filtering every faggot in the world right in the first boss. 3 was alright but it was just 2 with a stamina bar.

No.

Attached: 773.jpg (859x960, 218.04K)

just 2 with a magic bar*

fucked up there real quick

you made a gay thread here op

Attached: hbe73xk7ho441.jpg (1024x576, 116.64K)

Numbered Souls games? No thanks. Demon's souls, the first Dark Souls, and Bloodborne are the ones I always find myself going back to.

Attached: giga.png (300x337, 41.66K)

DeS and BBfags act like the bottom-right all of the fucking time. Only DaS3 and Sekirobros are true chads.

DS2 unironically innovated too much and they didn't iron out all the problems new ideas would bring
still I rather have a game try something different than showing me nothing but castles and knights the whole game while riding on dark souls' nostalgia

>2 is the worst game in the Dark Soul series
>Scholar of the first sin edition is the best game in the series

I don't know how they turned it around so hard but yeah I think Scholar actually placed a benchmark that 3 got close too reaching but didn't quite make it.