>I prefer Bloodborne to Sekiro, but would appreciate a Sekiro II more.
Doesn't make sense.
It seems most likely that, after Elden Ring, if FromSoftware made a sequel it'd be either Sekiro 2 or Bloodborne 2
Adam Sanders
Ryan Garcia
I don't know if a continuation of the story would be good. Balancing Sekiro would be pretty hard. Where could he go from who he was at the end of the last game gameplay-wise? Is there space for more skill? More prosthetics? On the other hand some asspull move like making him lose his hand, skills and strength would be bad in its own right.
Jonathan Robinson
Shuhei isn't the president of SIE anymore so there won't be a Bloodborne 2, he is a huge fan of From and the only reason it happened
Activision funds games like Sekiro once in a blue moon
Most likely scenario is we're getting another 3 game deal with Bamco's shitty budget and time constraints
Isaiah Robinson
It makes sense. Bloodborne doesn't have more room to grow cause it's already a perfect game.
Joseph Cook
I know that. I'm not saying it's impossible but a major part of the appeal of Bloodborne is exploring this incredible mysterious world and uncovering its secrets. A sequel to it would be like the DLC which is fine but didn't really build up on the strength of the main game.
Luis Parker
Bloodborne
>same old gimmicky stuff(dodge, weapon transformations, pseudo victorian era, tentacle ayylmaos)
Sekiro
>potential for new stuff( new moves, improved gameplay, new chinese/korean lore)
Only brainlets would choose BB, same people who begged for DS sequel.