Was the Ps2 more powerful than the Gamecube?

>why is everyone saying it's games looked like shit?
Because no matter how many effects you put on screen the visual presentation was still extremely muddy compared to the other consoles.
Theres a reason so many multiplats looked much better elsewhere.
Imagine if their exclusives werent held back by that, shit would hold up so much better today.

Something isn't good just because it's new but the standards of today means the best now is better than the best previously

>Jak and Daxter
>realistic

>dreamcast
>a console weaker than the ps2
Lmao

>Kingdom Hearts
>Muddy

To be fair i only owned a ps2 as a teen so i wouldn't have anything to compare it too, but i remember it very colorful. I guess the GTA, GoW and MGS games did look muddy though, but they were probably just artistic directions.

>if their exclusives werent held back by that,
Not at all. While textures are shit, I rather deal with that than take away the uniqueness of ps2 transparency. There's a reason why all silent hill 2 ports feel soulless compared to ps2.

>setting in the ps2 menu for widescreen didnt change any games settings
>you had to change it in each game
Why the fuck did they do it this way?

bing bing wahooooo
mama miaaaa

Muddiness isnt meaning color, its kind of like visual noise that just blurs the image because theres so much aliasing.
The ps2 looks like ass native even with a crt
The games look great, the console itself add a lot of drawbacks to what were great titles.

>just assumes I meant on another console
Why do people do this
I mean what if the PS2 was better
Not what if the games were elsewhere dummy.

No. Multiplats looked and ran worse on PS2 than GC.