Nah. The campaign was shit that was only worth it for the Reznov twist.
World at War and Call of Duty 2 have the best campaigns.
Nah. The campaign was shit that was only worth it for the Reznov twist.
World at War and Call of Duty 2 have the best campaigns.
Same, always interesting looking back on stuff and realizing some stuff was pretty deep, especially for video games
>blops 1 comes out in 2010
>11 when it released
>20 now
>underage
k
Name a better COD campaign.
Everything to do with the JFK assassination hints and brainwashing/LSD MK ultra tier shit was really interesting and hasnt been done in a big budget game since
I liked World at War but it had an objectively shit campaign. Hurr durr commies and island hopping. It was boring.
>Decide to get the new MW game cause friend wants me to join his clan or something
>Try out the campaign
>Every level is super short but feels like they last forever because gameplay is basically just run 20 feet, hurdle into cover, shoot forward, repeat.
>Story doesn't fuck around with brutality of war but it spins all the fucked up shit as basically "This savages deserve to perish so war is justified" with one character basically going on tangents on why we need less privacy and more funding on the military and he is treated as 100% correct
>Multiplayer is literally just "Whoever see's the other guy first wins"
I do not understand the appeal.
It's a military thing, you wouldn't get it.
Props to Treyarch for actually doing that, probably got some shit from Big brother from that