How did Bayonetta 2 manage to be so much better than DMC5 despite coming out in 2014?

How did Bayonetta 2 manage to be so much better than DMC5 despite coming out in 2014?

Attached: 568167-bayonetta-2-nintendo-switch-front-cover.jpg (800x800, 168.92K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=z9ebzDdYd5g
twitter.com/AnonBabble

By staying true to the franchise and not butchering its characters.

Attached: V3RGIL VS VERGIL.jpg (1100x1635, 679.01K)

DMC was never good. DMC 5 was more DMC.

Bayonetta was always good. bayo 2 was more Bayo.

>game from franchise A that comes later should automatically be better than game that came earlier from franchise B
what fucked up logic is this?

Bayonetta 2 isn't even as good as 1.

>2014

Attached: kaiba.gif (500x381, 295.2K)

It was full of setpieces in place of interesting combat, which is great for players who want to make cool-looking shit happen without knowing what they’re doing.

>worse than the first one and nearly any DMC game
I’m going to say via platform exclusively in your delusional eyes. W101 was the actual Bayonetta successor and a better game than DMC5, but your casual fanboy ass needs to flagwave.

DMC5 has far less content than Bayo 2 despite having far longer to develop that content, that's what kind of logic

Let's not humiliate DMC5 that badly by comparing it to Bayo 1, give it a fair shot