Don't lie to me, this is the truth isn't it?

broken characters are staple in old fighting games, its just that the gap between melee's best to melees worst is way too fucking big. really good players like Kuroda could beat really good Yuns and Chuns with Q, but you never see a "good" bowser player beating any of the gods using Fox.

Depends on the game, but the general rule on Yas Forums is "old game good, new gamed bad".

I prefer vice city for aestetic reasons

Smash isn't just a fighting game, therefore that point becomes absolutely mute.

Kuroda was an anomaly. Any other Q players get blown the fuck up. The most you get is the stray Hugo player upsetting tournies

This is a retarded image, I see people complain about people who favor SA all the time.
I'm also convinced these melee ultimate shit flinging contests are all bullshit. People who actually play either of the games are too busy playing the actual fucking games to truly hate either one. It's all dumb rosterfags and leffen fanboys who don't actively play either game.

Yes, you're right, Smash 64 is the best in the series.

SFV is good, fuck off.

This, if they show that they trully play this game then nobody complains, some of the meleefags are really chill but its a small minority because of the compeititve side.
If Competivefags stay on their own circle then we havent got stinky melee on 5 years.
On a side note, yes.

There's a simple explanation to this: Smashfags are cocksuckers that will gargle Sakurai's balls with every new installment and will take personal offense if you don't like it. Of course, this is manchildren in general but many of them are attracted to Nintendo products and the colorful, simple, characters that they create. Also see: Sonic, Crash, etc.