Is downloading games more harmful to the environment than physical? Those data centers are generating emissions 24/7.
Is downloading games more harmful to the environment than physical? Those data centers are generating emissions 24/7
Other urls found in this thread:
bbc.com
twitter.com
are you stupid or baiting
Don't care.
The environment can't be damaged. Essentially it's a conspiracy designed to fear monger and create profits.
>imagine thinking you can actually change the course of nature of a fucking PLANET
Only retards and doomers believe its not part of Earths natural cycle.
No it's a legitimate issue. This was focused on video streaming but games are often 50-100GB these days in addition to online play bandwidth.
bbc.com
creating physical things will always produce more waste than anything digital
>legitimate issue
jesus dude
Lol?
That's a one time process though. Many people will delete and redownload their games... especially on consoles. I thought Microsoft was doing underwater data centers that would be super efficient.
Just admit it that you're a lazy and hedonistic piece of shit. No need for mental defense stories.
stfu, greta. Go buy another 5k dollars chair.
The main problem with data centers (from an environmental point ot view) is that they use a lot of electricity and most of that electricity is generated from fossil fuels. If we switched to sources with no GHGs (renewable or nuclear) it wouldn't be an issue.
And besides, physical media is also made in factories which consume a lot electricity, so that's just as much of a problem.
It's either that or giant landfills.
We literally have historic data showing that you're talking bullshit
>The environment can't be damaged.
Lets remove all the trees on this planet then.
>7 billion people can't affect the course of an ecosystem
A lot of that energy requirement comes from cooling, which is why AWS have been investing in passively cooled datacenters in colder regions.
Basically just opening vents and letting the freezing temperatures outside do the work.
>encouraging people to consume less is a psyop so that companies can increase profits
Fucking spastic
who cares we're all fucked anyways whatre you gonna do with all the games that have been manufactured and have been sold and are collecting dust unsold in some warehouse or sitting on some greasy collectors shelf
>BBC
Deal with your rape gangs, before you deal with game CDs
I literally don't care about the environment, that's a future people problem
And that's why you should only use a power efficient device like a tablet (with some button peripherals) and play exclusively low spec/retro games.
>But mooooooom, I NEED a 600W PSU because I must have more polygons and shaders and raytracing!
Unless you're already 60, you'll be experiencing issues before you die.
When Bangladesh goes underwater the West is in for some wild shit.
It is very much a current problem. Where I live, the mere idea of winter is disappearing before my eyes, in mere 15 years.
I still don't care about that doomsayer shit.
the environment died for me when they tried to ban my car
I refuse to believe anyone is actually this stupid.
then move, faggot, I am not buying an ev shitbox or paying extra taxes just so you can see snow for longer.
piss off.
eh the more immediate effects will be ecosystem fuckery. birds and bugs are extremely sensitive to weather and temperature changed. No birds? Too many bugs. Too many bugs? No crops. Maybe far less drastic than that, but it’s going to be a real bitch for farmers in the coming decades.
the planet wouldn't need saving if it didn't have billions of useless nigger running about.
And the energy for cooling usually comes from electricity too. The core issue here is that electricity isn't generated cleanly.
So your life is money? Nothing else to consider? A soulles money-bot that only exists to earn and consume?
Africa (and brown people in general) consume far less energy than white people.
Those billions of useless niggers produce literally everything white people use, supply scales to meet demand, not the other way around.
yes because they live in mud huts and shit out 8 kids per head.
niggers in the west are more wasteful even.
lmao blacks don't produce shit
There's a lot of land in Europe for those Bangladeshis to start a new life.
yes. I would rather the entire planet be engulfed in flames than have to downgrade my car and have to pay taxes which support useless subhumans a continent away.
>niggers in the west are more wasteful even.
They're actually not though. Most niggers are poor so they can't afford to be wasteful.
...do you really think China has the raw resources to supply most of the planet with goods?
They've been investing in African port/mining operations for a reason.
thank God we shut our borders and are shooting at migrants now.
Should have been less rapey last time.
I know this is a shitpost but you basically just described how wealth inequality/land-loss is going to fuck up western society in real time.
so what if the raw materials come from africa?
the chinks mined it.
What are you going to do when there are 150 million people on your border?
>The environment can't be damaged.
They aren't mining it.
China builds the infrastructure that moves those resources OUT of Africa and then uses the loans they gave to African countries to blackmail the local governments.
The actual mining/extraction is still done by dirt poor nignogs and children.
It's literally cheaper to use indentured labour than to industrialize the mining process because Africa is deliberately fucked by every major power.
machine guns.
the solution to pollution is death.
If you kill the brown people, only the worthy, clean humans will survive
>I am 14 and think you can just kill refugees at the border without causing massive social unrest
Yes. And streaming is even worse.
oh man all those brown people living in china oh man
Those datacenters would still be up regardless if you're downloading or not. Plus the DC could be using hydro electric generator
The problem is population. If population growth continues shit will be unsustainable regardless on how much we cut down on emissions. And honestly why would you want an absolute fuck ton of people living in squalor over a tenth of that amount living decent, first-world lives.
You can just say they are invaders and show few corpses with imported guns, that's what Israel does and nobody care.
I also work in the DC. Our cooling is basically fans on a open blade. We have 15 servers in a 40u rack
Retard.
The real answer is thus: you bribe/threaten a suitable border country into accepting those refugees and then provide funding/support for camps for them.
Then, as numbers swell and conditions within those camps worsen, you start to cut funding.
Eventually, violent groups within the migrant population will start organizing, at which point you cut funding entirely and designate the entire population as a terrorist threat.
The host country is left dealing with all the bullshit from IEDs, stabbings and general violence and you have free reign to shoot/block any movement over the border.
it helps when the palestinians opening call for murdering the entire Israeli population.
as far as I'm aware, the pakis haven't done the same yet
yes, you can actually kill illegal aliens
holy fuck found the actual jew.
You """people""" are terrorist invaders on Palestinian land.
Didn't know Greta (the hidden agenda) Thunburg posted here, this site is for over 18's you realise
>I'm going to support an organisation that rewards literal suicide bombers
hint: even arabs hate palestinians, they're basically the niggers of the middle east
I wish I didn't share the board with so many retards like (you)
From least to most CO2
>playing outside
>playing board game
>playing singleplayer game
>playing multiplayer game
>streaming a game
Bottom line is people only care about the environment in the same way that they care about getting likes on facebook.
People still drive cars, people still consume electricity from fossil fuels, people still use air planes just like Greta
It's all very superficial.