Just read the cia paper.
It has been replicated with diferent setups, done by real scientists.
It's not even my idea, there's plenty of /x/ videos claiming the mind can affect a machine RNG.
I made a quick experiment to see if /x/ shit is real
Carson Watson
Jack Bailey
there is no machine RNG that would defeat the purpose of RNG
Ryder Hill
It also affects pseudo RNG.
Daniel Sullivan
cia paper is not a peer-reviewed scientific paper, almost because no scientist is wiling to sift through 90 pages of shit
>because you measured a slice? hah
what did he mean by this? infinite length of an object = infinite mass, unless the width and height of the object approach 0, which is impossible
>under what premise?
you retard: if my brain can somehow change the flow of electrons in a computer, then the other objects near it, with greater mass than my brain, should do it as well
furthermore, what actual evidence do you have that people can willingly change the flow of millions of electrons in a computer by just thinking about them
Samuel Peterson
the effect is absolutely real. it's not a coincidence that Steve Bannon got his fortune from pulling data from the WoW servers to selling in-game gold as well as using player data to feed algorithms for various purposes.
i find it fascinating how determined you are to make others believe this. If you are surely right, wouldn't you encourage further testing as that would confirm your position? Or are you attempting to dissuade people from finding legitimate patterns based that have predictive power?
Evan Torres
shoot some dice
Nicholas Walker
Make it available on mobile so I don't have to walk my lazy American ass from my couch to my PC to go set it up. I'll wait.
Carson Cruz
ctrl+f "schizo" 0/0 results found
what the fuck?
Jonathan Diaz
yeah well fuckin magnets, how do they work?
check mate, labcoat
Jackson Baker
>encourage further testing
burden of proof is on you, you are trying to say that X is real, i am saying there is a lack of evidence
>legitimate patterns
if you want legitimacy, here's knoweldge coming from a person with a background in theoretical probability:
you need to show me why these "patterns" are from actual changes in the probability distribution of the PseudoRng(...) function by running an experiment with enough trials and finding a low enough p value to show statistical significance
>but science hard what is p value :(