Why did no ancient civilization consciously practice eugenics?

That's the only way it works and it's what the Nazi Party did. The question is why did it take until 1933 for someone to try?

Masterful in what?

What would be a master in one environment would be a slave in another.

The arctic, the Savannah and the forest are very different places with different needs

Aryan caste system in India, but it was probably implemented too late and they didnt kill enough niggerplebes.

>leaving deformed babies to die is completely different from a conscious eugenics program
No, that literally is eugenics

and the white man still conquered them all. how is that?

they didnt know about genetics and dna you utter memeflag kike nigger

Also, many of those weak babies would've died naturally 50% of babies died of disease or similar causes before reaching adulthood these would be disproportionately those with weak immune systems.

they did by default with their little to no medical intervention. Now we practice saving every life, doing unknown damage to our own gene pool. Having more children and letting weaker ones die naturally/risky activities is the answer. Also glorifying high risk high reward situations

Personally, I don't want to abandon medicine. You aren't going to get society or to accept not going to the hospital or getting vaccines for my child. If you want to be really retarded we could just ban soap, refrigeration, and remove plumbing from our civilization to spread disease but that is brainlet level thinking.

The vikings kinda did. But then they decided becoming a somali nigger with 60IQ is better than being the master race. Thats how gay they became.

>misses the point and attacks straw-men exaggerations.

I hope you can see the point at least, it's quite simple