Neither, they both failed, just like communism.
Which form of Monarchy is better?
Dominic Allen
Justin Anderson
>Child rape is now legal.
Gabriel Garcia
Jews are master litigators, how do you expect to stop them from taking advantage of a document?
Zachary Anderson
I'm a semi-constitutionalist but I'd argue that absolutism is better because constitutional monarchy is pretty much a shadow republic, which is really just shadow oligarchy. Most of the problems of republicanism overlap with constitutional monarchy. This is also part of why some constitutional monarchies are susceptible to being abolished by the masses, because the core "values" and propaganda of republicanism are still encouraged in a nation with constitutional monarchy.
In other words fuck democracy.
Juan Howard
Gee what gave that away britbong?
Adam Campbell
Ban them
Michael Hughes
Constitutional, provided the constitution is sound. There is no better system than a monarchy or dictatorship with a benevolent ruler, the problem is that this never ever lasts. The people need some sort of guarantee in the case of some kings fucktard son getting into the position cause he had a heart attack etc. Or he's just a fuck and gets in power through succession. Possibly even part of the constitution can be removal and putting next in line in. There are a lot of constraints a truly benevolent ruler would no doubt agree to considering these issues.
Dylan Smith
Actually, only communism failed. Kingdoms have fallen, but Europe has plenty of royalty
Jack Ward
They can get others to act for them.
Matthew Murphy
>wanting to be owned and governed by a bunch of inbred homosexuals who have no loyalty to the nation