Which form of Monarchy is better?

Constitutional Monarchy?
or
Absolutist Monarchy?

Attached: So Gathered Revolt Wait.jpg (1280x720, 103.14K)

Yas Forums isn’t the best place to come for help with your 9th grade social studies homework.

Constitutional, there must be some limits on power especially for preserving the rights of the people

Theocracy

this

Oh, I'm sorry.
Did I interrupt some much more worthy threads?

Yo Alibaba is sexy not gonna lie bruh

I say a mix of a theocracy and a constitutional monarchy. Having a strong church is useful to keep a lid on degeneracy and preserve the culture, while having some limits on a monarch's powers ensures that one bad ruler (ie Commodus, the retarded degenerate son Marcus Aurelius) cannot fuck everything over

Absolute. If you're going to have a constitution then you may as well have a republic.

I agree. I don't see any reason to not keep a judicial branch either. They could do what they do now with the bill of rights, but also act as a watch on a monarch (would replace the role of president). This is all theoretical, but our system is about to take a shit