That's (your image, OP) is because international corporatism is very similar to socialism. Mass identity-less labour that you can exploit cheaply with power concentrated into the hands of a few.
End globalism/internationalism and mass immigration and you'll see capitalism go back to what it was meant to be
Oh you think the church will reduce inbreeding? You stupid fucking burger.
>”your basic needs might be guaranteed”
in communism? no.
1990's capitalism: If you succeed you succeed, if you fail you fail. If you failed, it was because you did something wrong, you should have planned better.
2010's capitalism: Oh, we see you have bought and merged so many companies that the entire US economy relies on you.
You did not save any money like a responsible adult? This is a crisis YOU caused?....Better give you 6 trillion+ dollars through a stimulus package and fed lending, while regular civs bend over and take this 250 billion coin toss.
You fucking idiot there are no bailouts and cronyism in capitalism, learn some simple political economics before you post some dumb shit.
A church with outreach that tries to expand yes.
Corporate socialism.
Money is just medium of exchange(basically to avoid a problem when you're trying to buy bread for tractor tires), effectively most things you could buy from the state cost very, very little in relation to what you've earned. This led to people buying stuff whenever they were out, so they've introduced rationing. For low-supply goods, like cars or flats, instead of rations you've had more or less queues, which is were multi-year deal(there were of course exceptions). Now they didn't ban reselling of goods. If you've had used car that you didn't need, then keeping it for yourself would be antithetical for communists, but at the same time due to scarcity just plain and simply taking them away(not to mention that establishing when "you don't use it very much" is always going to end with people who think they were victimised) would be extremely unpopular, so you were allowed to sell them at the price you've find satisfying.
As the new cars were price fixed and their price didn't at all reflect their value(just so the party could brag that their citizens can buy more cars for the money they earn), the 2nd hand actually did and boy the prices were crazy. This btw. also applied to farming equipment, for the countries where farming wasn't completely collectivised.
Also as for the money and personal property stuff - if you didn't read mememasters and dumb Seattlelites talking about communism but more "applicational" marxists you'd notice that for them property and possession are different, that is you can own a car or a watch, or even small farm(depending on how much do they stretch it) but you can't own a factory, in their understanding if you needed to hire someone to do work with an you owned then that was property which was to be abolished, more or less. Money itself was a controversial topic but eventually communists settled on quasi MMT version of the origins of it and kept it to function as medium of exchange.
False dichtomy
>dude just get a "free" car from the junkyard and then pay for all the parts that need replacing