Please Yas Forums, define "whiteness". Everyone here seems to argue about who is white and who isn't. It'd be a subject of great interest to specifically agree on which legitimate criteria to use in order to define this term. Is it skin color, europeanness, historical achievement? a mix of those 3? Something else? Tell me about your own vision of this term and its possible applications, let's settle this once and for all.
Please Yas Forums, define "whiteness". Everyone here seems to argue about who is white and who isn't...
Other urls found in this thread:
duckduckgo.com
thuletide.wordpress.com
twitter.com
Only Frisians and Saxons are white/blank. Franks are not blank.
That's interesting, can you tell me why specifically?
Caucasian
people of "germanic" descent only. if your 23andme says youre from northern/western europe exclusively, i couldn't care less what you look like.
Jared Taylor explained it well to that Indian CNN journalist. It was something about people having decendents that have gone through evolution in Europe in the last few thousand years.
If you mean by white as skin color I use my eyes to measure someones whiteness, if you mean what people I perceive as white - every European.
-Germanic
-Pagan
What is the justification behind this choice?
I define “whiteness” as having red hair, cause those motherfuckers are the whitest whites that ever whited.
because its a term used by the Anglos to quickly differentiate between own and foreigners / Slaves doing the slave trade era. Its also why Danes, Swedes, Germans are historically not considered white.
White = Saxon, Anglo, Frisians and Briton
Roman influence, defended their germanic Pagan Faith at last before they were forced to confess to the Alien Sand God.
It's one of the branches of our evolutionary tree, we'd hope to not get mingled with the African variant and we'd want the kike infestation to leave us.
Caucasian refers to Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. White refers specifically to Europids.
>OP posts a white person
>UHHH Yas Forums PLEASE DEFINE WHITE
Why do the kikes do this? Is it so they know which people to target?
>people of "germanic" descent only
No. Germanic peoples are Germanic not white. White is not a term used in Germanic nations. Look at how people like Hitler referred to the European peoples. White is a term used in the Anglo sphere doing the slave trade. The Anglos copied the Spanish system.
she looks like a slav and...
>slavs are not white
>French and English aren't white
>Russians aren't white
>finns and swedes aren't white
>irish are white
>german are white
>scots are white
Oh? It seems that your view isn't shared by other people in this thread. So only anglo-saxons could be considered white, this seems indeed historically correct considered the origin of this term, but most people here would take for granted than germans and skandis are white. There is a clear discrepancy of opinion.
>Caucasians of Southern Russia
they are not and never was considered "white" by in the Anglo sphere.
Lactose intolerance = non-White
Wow that was hard
>Canadian saying who is and isn't white
Nobody even knows what Canadians look like.
including, but not only, pink lips, pink nipples
I just took what I could get my hands on. Thread is pic unrelated.
Is there a more disingenuous shitpost than this? I guarantee OP is not confused about who is or is not white when he thinks it's a bad thing.
Wrong, in Germany White People are called what they are "Weiß" (german for white)
There is dozens of those maps all with different data. Go shill somewhere else.
Looks like Lactose Tolerance is a Celto-Geremanic thing
t. lactose intolerant
Make some effort, just saying "X is X" or "X isn't X" isn't enough to support your point.
>It seems that your view isn't shared by other people in this thread
my "view" does not need to be shared. Its the facts.
The "white" term only entered other European languages after WW2 when America became the front and master of the western world. The term is a dated retarded one that barely makes any sense hence why no one can agree on it.
That is why I use it as it was intended.
>So only anglo-saxons could be considered white
"could" ARE friendo. Nothing wrong with it. You and I are not white and never was considered as. Why do you care what foreign words and foreigners think about your people? Will any European be considered French? No? Well its the same with white. Its an Anglo word.
>Lactose intolerance = non-White
that silly. Lactose tolerant = high north Germanic admixture. Which is not the same as white.
>dum bruce Slavic/ruskie girls aren't white there half chink.
same with French and English there half bred whites mixed with nigger Italian. if your not 99.9 anything on 23&me your a half breed and shouldn't breed
the majority are now basically brazil 2.0 you have to go to the rural areas in Ontario/alberta/Quebec to find a white. that being said im a white female. most of the posters are either pakis/muslims or actual flips/chinks. theres a hundred to every 1 white now in canada
According to white purists, only europeans are white. The non-european in this picture (right) is thus non-white.
t. lactose intolerant
Your arguments are truly a Shakespearean affair, so well versed and intricate.
>English aren't white
they are the very base for what is considered white. They came up with the word to describe themselves after all.
I swear to God if you newfags respond to one more slide thread...
Left is Scotish
Right is French
Facts are simple.
They are germanic, came from northern Germany to steal Romano-Briton natives theor Land.
One could answer: why should we privilege the historical aspect of this term? Every word is flexible, should the modern "definition" be discarded just because it's only recent? Are we forbidden to reuse this term in a different manner because of the past?
whites aren't white
You may not like the truth but there it is
The Frank priest were the ones that removed the true religion Wr.Aldanism(read Thet Oera Linda Bok) from the with lands with worshipping a kike on a stick.
yes retard and what does that has to do with the price of bread? The English came up with the word and used the word. Its meaning they defined whether idiotic retards like you agree or not.
They are not facts if you cherry pick a map that supports your point of view.
>using cuckcuckgo
Good luck with getting your data sold by a kike.
Who even made this map? A lot of Russians, Ukranians and Belarussians eat and drink dairy products exceptionally often (at least once a week). Milk, quark, smetana (sour cream), ryazhenka, cream, etc. I live almost in the center of Russia (the Urals), no lactose intolerant whites known to me. BTW, being white means possessing R1A or R1B haplogroup and being brought up in European culture and values.
cool ok Abdul.
>French have interbred there entire history and thus are super mutts and can get fucked
>Italians were never white
>Russians were white at one time until they decided to fuck that up and fuck chinks
>brits aren't white and haven't been white since the romans came and fucked them all down there half breeds
>scots are white they lived in isolation the only ones that aren't are lowland scots
>welsh are white unless they are racemixers
>irish have always been white they were settled by white Egyptians fleeing niggers and jews back in the stone age
>germanics are also white
>scandis and finns are not white they were fucked by mongols while traveling to there countries
>The "white" term only entered other European languages after WW2
Yeah nah
Tell me why lactose intelorance correlates with whiteness. Isn't this criterion only a pretext to say that germanic people only are white? You're probably using this map ONLY because it correlates with the original opinion that only germanic people are white. So we're back to our starting point, why should the germanic people be considered white? You can't say because of lactose intolerence, because it would be a circucal argument
> French
Ethnically North African Berber.
Franks -> Christians Foreign Faith, Romanized
Frisians & Saxons -> Germanic Polythist Native Faith, Germanic
>anyone who has white skin but nigger eyes is a halfbred white. meaning there 100% non white does this make sense now Ferdinand?
>whiteness
in SJW-terms, it means having an acceptable (for the majority) phenotype that is not too exotic so that you don't raise suspicion of being 'too different'
now, the jury is still out whether people can be intrinsically psychologically different because of their genetics. There is no conclusive evidence for or against this so everyone speculating that 'n&ggers are dumb by nature' is just speculating.
In more objective and mainstream terms, it means someone of acceptably fair complexion (it's subjective what is 'acceptable') and mostly Caucasoid (aka West Eurasian) skull shape
I say mostly, because some are hybrids like lots of Russians, Finns, Tatars and even some Nordic Germanics (think Bjork) have clear mongoloid element, but are still mostly caucasoid. Keanu Reeves is also 'white' despite having some mongoloid elements and not being 'white' for white supremacists
which brings us to the white supremacists, who usually define 'white' as northwestern european or broadly european. That definition would make your humble servant a proud sandnigger and a dune coon but luckily most people aren't white supremacists and have no idea I'm genetically not European so I can reap off all the benefits of 'white privilege' lol
why would this interest anyone?
Forget the map. Lactose tolerance = whiteness
You're white then
>why should we privilege the historical aspect of this term?
we dont have to but as you can see by this very thread that no one agrees on what it means hence I argue going back to its established meaning. Does "white" refer to skin color? Race? Purity? Historically all of those things combined with nationality and the protection against enslavement.
>should the modern "definition" be discarded just because it's only recent?
no ofc not but tell me what is the modern "definition" of white? No two people will agree on that outside the Anglo sphere.
>Are we forbidden to reuse this term in a different manner because of the past?
again no ofc not. But why would you? There are other more precise terms surely? Also ones that are not foreign and old.
Also French
Milk is white. People who drink it are white. Hollywood demonises milk drinkers. Jews are lactose intolerant. Take the lactose pill
are you dense or something? You just posted a picture proving my point. Australia is not a European nation but very much a part of the Anglo sphere. The term white have been used in Australia for a now a couple of hundreds years.