Is science fake and gay? The whole "peer review" process seems to be a giant grift...

"Science" is a religion

Trust the experts for shit that you don't understand.

Those things you think are factors are not facrors, stfu. Only scientists can study shit.

Physics created the computer you are typing on.

have you actually read any postmodernism? Deleuze has a lot of interesting shit to say that would probably surprised you.

What kind of science are you talking about? Because to most fields the whole social shift stuff is irrelevant. Researchers care about getting results and their field, they don't concern themselves with pandering and other bullshit.

The garbage heaps are social 'sciences' wherr crackpots shit out conjecture and dress it up. Studying design and methodology is so laughably bad in these fields that no one takes them seriously.

Trust me when I say that scientists and engineers look down on social science as a joke.

(((Social sciences))) and most "soft" sciences are indeed, fake and gay.

>It's pay-for-play.
Damn capitalists! Oh ... wait ...
>A paper claiming penises influenced global warming passed peer review.
What? Cite it.
>NaturalNews
The guy behind this site thinks that germs aren't real. He's about as credible as the black supremacy crowd.

Are you advocating nihilism?
... or are you just advocating your preferred type of anti-science trash ... while dismissing every other type of anti-science trash?

One problem is that peer review can be anonymous. I think we should be able to see the names of our so-called experts.

Science is about questions, not answers.
Any scientist claiming to have answers isn't actually a scientist, he's a priest.

>"Science" is a religion
Religions don't change in the face of new evidence.