Makes sense, but in modern times there would have to be a greater justification than the lord defending the serf since the national armies and police of the state are what defend people now.
MONARCHISM THREAD
Michael Gomez
Sebastian Mitchell
Monarchy is cringe af
If you want a truly traditional but also sensical society we need fascism
Angel Anderson
Why not monarcho-fascism?
Nicholas Martin
You know carlists and fascists in Spain hated each other, right?
But forgetting that thing, fascism and monarchy can co-exist, and even cooperate, this depends on the monarch, though. Italy had a compromise between fascism and monarchism, and they were compatible for 21 years.
Nicholas Martin
Lincoln Gutierrez
What is an election other than allowing liars the divine right of kings?
Austin Howard
>you know carlists and fascists in Spain hated each other
They still fought together, but yeah, I know. I just like having an excuse to post carlists.
>fascism and monarchy can co-exist, and even cooperate
When I meant monarcho-fascism I meant that the head of state is a monarch under a hereditary system, not compromising with a dictator. It makes perfect sense to me that a monarch who knows and trains his own son of his own blood makes a system far more stable than a dictatorship.
Levi Gonzalez
Consider a monarchy, America. An absolute one, to be more specific.
Eli Brown
IMO the only right choices are either a monarchy or a government that defends only negative rights with life-long or very long positions so that these people get experience to do their work.
Ethan Myers
What's funny is that there's no consensus on who the monarch would be. We have the Kennedys and Washingtons, but the people would never accept the establishment seizing power. The two best options are thus an American Caesar or the Windsors.